If you had complete freedom, you could do anything, go anywhere, this could include freedom from death, would you choose to restrict your freedom?
2007-06-23 20:55:00 · 8 answers · asked by Sprinkle 5 in Social Science ➔ Psychology
Ivan R I appreciate your answer, glad that you feel you have more freedom than most, but no one has complete freedom, and the question is about IF you had complete freedom.
2007-06-23 21:55:54 · update #1
When I asked this question, it was because I love the restrictions we have on this world, and if I had complete freedom, I would still choose a restricted life like we have as part of my free choice. So I would restict my freedom for the occasional life like this.
2007-06-24 02:17:09 · update #2
I would use it to create the perfect, self contained world and live in it forever.
2007-06-23 20:58:04 · answer #1 · answered by bruvvamoff 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hello,
(ANS) I already have almost complete freedom, I could do almost anything I choose. I don't personally have many of the constraints most people have. I have money and I have no debits at all. All I have I own. Yes! I could go any where in the world if I chose too but whats the point of going some where just because I can or just to prove I can??
**There's no such thing as freedom from death that's why humans invented religion because death is what we fear most, fear most because no body can escape death, its a waste of time & energy trying to escape death. The more you accept your own death the freer you can be, the happier you will be.
**I have more freedom than most but having such freedom is extremely daunting, the more freedom you have the scarier it becomes. Its like when you swim in shallow waters full of coral and then hit the drop off point and suddenly you are swimming in water so deep you cannot see the bottom, its actually terrifying for the first time unless you are an experienced diver? Its what I imagine being weightless or weightlessness is like, quite disorientating.
**With freedom comes responsability not in the heavy sense of the word. Meaning the ability to respond?
IR
2007-06-24 04:13:18 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I HAVE complete freedom. And, NO, I would never restrict it. The only restrictions I have are my recalcitrant eyes which have made it necessary, well . . .actually simply sensible . . .for me to have a driver these days. I can still drive, pretty much. I restrict that freedom in great fear of causing harm to others. If no one else used the roads, that would be another matter. I have modified my life and now just canoe wherever I want to go. Since I only want to go where a canoe can go, it works out well for me.
2007-06-24 04:22:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't think there can ever be such a thing as complete freedom unless you were the only person left in the world, then you would have no responsibility for anyone or anything other than yourself. That's the only way to be free, but as its unlikely, then as I've said I don't think it's possible. An impossible dream!
2007-06-24 04:55:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Only the lack of money 'restricts' my freedom. But if I had the cash I wouldn't change my basic self.
2007-06-24 04:00:45 · answer #5 · answered by I'm Sparticus 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
After I had rung out every nuiance of questionable behavior for it's possible thrill quotent, I would limit behavior that resulted in harm to somebody else. Hate to hurt people by accident.
2007-06-24 03:59:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
absolutely not. i'd do whatever i felt like doing at any given moment, forever. why limit oneself needlessly?
2007-06-24 03:58:57 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would use my senses and do the right thing at the right moment.
2007-06-24 03:58:33 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋