English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

My grandma put in deposit for an apartment, she was suppose to move in but the manager did not finish fixing the place so the move in date was push back. During that time, another complex for low incomes had a vacant apartment and gave her the offer. The rent was cheaper and the place was better so she decided to take this one instead. She did call and tell the manager of the place she deposit to rent the place out. Can she get back all or part of her deposits?

2007-06-23 20:26:55 · 4 answers · asked by healthy 1 in Business & Finance Renting & Real Estate

She lives in california

2007-06-23 20:31:41 · update #1

4 answers

Read the contract. Everything hinges on that.
Because the place was not ready on the day she was supposed to move in, the contract was possible violated by the landlord.
A clause on deposits might make it possible for your grandmother to get back the deposit. Or it may have included a stipulation that the deposit is nonrefundable since it will form part of her rent, fees etc.
Read the contract

2007-06-23 20:34:45 · answer #1 · answered by QuiteNewHere 7 · 0 0

Yes. Your grandma can get her deposit back because the apartment was not ready by the move in date, she has not take possession of the apt and no expense has incurred, therefore, she can cancel the contract without penalty.

2007-06-23 20:35:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Do you recognize that many times circumstances the regulation isn't black and white? there's a honest quantity of reasoning that comes into play. Given basically what you defined in the case above, i individually could say no, your grandma is caught! right this is my questioning: She entered right into a marvelous-faith contract. HAD the condominium supervisor fastened the region on time, your grandma could have been in the condominium on the time the different one got here alongside. you may locate that she would desire to not have purely up and moved to the recent condominium, stunning? yet you say, "Wait! She by no potential moved in. The maintenance not on time the circulate-in date, which unfolded this would of worms." ok, examining between the lines i will see that on the 2d whilst it became into desperate that the maintenance have been inflicting a delay, your grandma nevertheless needed the condominium. particular, perhaps she became into disillusioned that her circulate became into not on time. perhaps she became into even annoyed by potential of the belief, what's taking so long? yet she did not attempt to get out of her contract stunning then. that's huge! At that 2d, it became into not the maintenance that made her choose out of the contract. So, in consequence, she entered right into a sparkling contract whilst she agreed to the delay to her moving in. THEN this greater helpful deal got here alongside and he or she began to have customer's experience sorry approximately. i don't see how a courtroom could say that because of fact she replaced her innovations (in the face of a greater helpful deal) that she without notice could get her money lower back. I surely does not rule that way! yet ... judges and jurors are people, purely like me. So, not something surprises me that they might rule.

2016-11-07 08:12:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think she should be able to get her money back

2007-06-23 20:29:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers