Two questions--answer both please.
If you dont know what "Rho^2" is, (the statistic relating attribution of a phenomonen to the causal variable) it is, you can still answer.
When a person lifts weights and takes steroids, what percentage of the increase in muscle mass is purely attributed to taking just the steroids? That is--how much muscle mass can someone gain simply by taking steroids, without exercising? (keeping overall body mass constant, to avoid the confusion of increasing muscle mass simply by increasing your body weight by overeating).
If I weigh 200, and take steroids for 6 weeks, and after six weeks I do not exercise, and I control my diet, so that I still weigh 200 at the end of 6 weeks. How much muscle mass did I gain, and at the expense of what other type of tissue?
I dont care about the dosage, but lets speculate 40 mg / day of dianabol.
2nd Q--why does steroids supposedly accelerate or cause cancer? (liver I heard specifically)
2007-06-23
18:19:07
·
5 answers
·
asked by
Voltaire's book Candide
3
in
Health
➔ Men's Health