84 security tapes from pentagon 911 they only release 4 doctored frames?

Question

Do they honestly expect us to believe it was plane?

So why not release the 84 security tapes so we can all see it was a plane rather than posting unproven anonymous accounts online?

Answer 1

Yes, they do expect us to believe it - because with the horror of 9/11 - we would believe anything they told us.

But you go back and look at it later and you will notice:
No skid marks and torn up lawn where the "plane" hit the ground before hitting the building.
There are no marks from the wings or tail of the airplane on the building.
The reason given for there being no wreckage is it was consumed by the fire caused by airplane fuel. It was my understanding that airplane fuel didn't burn hot enough to consume all evidence of an aircraft ... except the engine that was found there ... an engine that does not even belong on that sort of plane.
Have any of you ever seen a plane wreck where the entire aircraft was disintegrated by the fire caused by it's fuel?
There were so many inconsistency's from that crash, the ones at the WTC's and that field in PA.

Get the movie "Loose Change" -- it will open your eyes.
http://www.loosechange.com
http://www.tvnewslies.org/html/loose_change_dvd.html
http://www.question911.com/
http://www.ebay.com Search; Loose Change

Answer 2

84 security cameras were running, thus 84 tapes. They do not run continuously but instead take a picture once a second. They are aimed in all different directions and only two caught anything at all on 911.

Now you do the math. An airplane fying at 500 mph. How far does it go in ONE second? They were lucky to get four pictures. Had the synch been 1/2 second more or less, they would only have gotten two pictures.

And the Pentagon is way over engineered. Due to the construction being done in WW TWO, steel was being used for ships and tanks but they had lots of cement so they made it out of lots of cement. Aluminum at 500 mph hitting solid cement pretty much vaporizes, which is what the winds and most of the body of the plane did. The high strength steel landing gear however, did not and were found inside the building.

Look at how a car folds up when it hits something at 50 mph. Then multiply it times 10 and add the fact the planes are made out of lighter weight materials than your car. Even your car seat belt is better than what they use in airplanes.

Answer 3

For starters how can a vaporised plane punch through 6 reinforced steel and concrete walls leaving a 16 foot hole in the C ring??? the engines found at the pentagon were only 4 foot diameter turbofans. They should have been 8 feet diameter.!!! Both engines were 5 tons each and 17 feet long. Why didnt they make any holes in the concrete walls?

Answer 4

Yes, because I saw it with my bare, non-doctored eyes. It's these damn conspiracy theories that get out. "Oh that couldn't be caused by a plane, it's too much damage." "Oh that explosion isn't big enough." You know what? I saw it! How do you think that makes those of us that actually witnessed it in person feel that you conspiracy theorists come out with alternate ideas when people clearly saw it happen?

Usually I don't mind alternate ideas, but there's enough evidence to tell you that it really happened.

Thank you for your straw man argument. So, by your theory there's no evidence that a plane crashed into the Pentagon. So why am I looking at pictures with a hole in the side of the Pentagon and a video recording of a plane flying into the Pentagon? Whether you like it or not the conspiracy theory is going to go down in the history books as short lived and forgotten therefore non-existent.

Answer 5

When the planes hit the WTC, you could see the impact caused by the body and wings of the aircrafts. There were no wing impact marks on the Pentagon. Something is fishy here.

Answer 6

I don't know why they don't release videotapes of the plane. They have them from lots of angles, including the interior (all the hallways were monitored). It would shut everyone up if they just released footage. What's the big deal? It's almost as though they want conspiracy theories out there.

Answer 7

So you're saying we have a missing plane presumably flying around lost for more than 5 1/2 years now?
My, wouldn't that make a great science fiction movie!

Answer 8

Why wouldnt you think its a plane?

Answer 9

No. And they don't care- either. Like the man who they work for- they just wanted to "throw us a bone"- so say they "did something", & shut us up. :(

Answer 10

I refer you to this

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=911_morons