English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

9 answers

It was the heat of the fuel that brought the towers down. They essentially melted and, due to the jets flying into them, the structure was damaged and the weight at the top was considerable. As for Osama, if I knew where he was, he'd be dead. Hope this helps!!

2007-06-23 17:17:02 · answer #1 · answered by roritr2005 6 · 0 2

The only 'conspiracy theroy' is the load of crap the 9/11 Commission tried to unload as the reasons for what happened that day. It amazes me that you idiots believe that a bunch of morons with box cutters and single-engine pilots ratings could out smart the worlds most advanced air security system and pull off the single most devastating attack on American soil. And as far as the jet fuel 'melting' the iron frames of the WTC towers, that scenario is just the most idiotic thing ever told to the world. In the history of the world, fire has never brought down ANY steel and concrete buildings. And the liars in our government want you to believe that the only three buildings ever to be brought down by fire all happened in the same city, on the same day. I have some beach-front property in Arizona I will sell you. The WTC Towers were built to withstand multiple aircraft strikes by planes quite similar to the ones that hit them.Those planes hitting those buildings had the same effect as you pushing a pencil through a screen. The Twin Towers were engineering marvels, decades ahead of their time. If you watch the hours of video of the collapse, you can see clearly the buildings being exploded BELOW the advancing 'collapse'. And one of those structures, WTC #7, had very little damage and, according to NYFD, small pockets of fire that could be extinguished with 2 lines. The buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition, not fire.And what about the plane that allegedly struck the Pentagon? Where is the wreckage from that aircraft? 767's don't evaporate into thin air after piercing a 16ft hole in a building.WAKE THE F*CK UP!!! Who planned and carried it out? We'll probably never know, but the 'Official' explanation is the true conspiracy theory. It's not even possible according to the laws of physics as we know them, and anyone who stayed awake during high school science class should know that. Unless you're too big a coward to look at the truth. Anyone who believes the 9/11 Commission Report is just stupid, or a coward.

2007-06-23 18:55:49 · answer #2 · answered by rick m 3 · 2 0

in fact Instinctual, in case you may think of roughly what in fact you would be perplexed. those towers have been introduced down by potential of the yank government, the finished terrorist act became into an interior activity, WTC7 became into introduced down with explosives, the pentagon became into hit with some thing different than a airplane. Iraq does not have weapons of mass destruction, Afghanistan does not have Osama, yet Iraq has oil, and Afghanistan has Poppy vegetation(CIA sells drugs to the international) to fund their wars, additionally controls the oil to sell to the international. what next --- Oh i comprehend!! Columbia, why confident, Columbia has oil, shall we make a plot that we could continually get those mafia riddled government, oh, purely that American government is likewise a mafia, the CIA.

2016-11-07 07:59:01 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

The Tower collapsed because of the heat from the jet fuel that softened and melted the iron beams supporting the builds structure. Check out this website: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Osama_bin_Laden, Osama is probably hiding from our Government Officials.

2007-06-23 17:23:17 · answer #4 · answered by kikaida42 3 · 2 1

I don't know if you are one of those who think Bush planned the attacks, but I have some questions for those who do.

Why didn't he blame it on terrorists who were friends with Saddam, rather than on "his friend" bin Laden. He wanted to take out Saddam all along, according to his critics, so why waste time on Afghanistan?

If he was so skilled at such a vast conspiracy, how could it be that he didn't plant nuclear weapons or partial nukes in Iraq to support his claim that Saddam was trying to get nukes?

Why are all the conspiracy theorists still walking around free if he is the type of person they all say he is. Wouldn't they have had "accidents" by now or strangely disappeared? Guys who have the power and will to carry out such conspiracies don't like to be found out and wouldn't be inhibited about destroying a few more lives after killing 3000 or so.

2007-06-23 17:23:02 · answer #5 · answered by Yaktivistdotcom 5 · 1 2

Charlie Sheen is this you again?

Simple physics moron. Heat metal with tremendous downward force and the metal becomes plastic. Once the first inch of motion starts in the movement of the supports then momentum takes over and that is virtually unstoppable. momentum=mass X velocity.

2007-06-27 16:18:15 · answer #6 · answered by Big K 5 · 0 0

Instead of continually asking questions which have been answered countless times - and with valid and verifiable facts - why don't you give us your reasons why you think the towers came down? Where you think Osama is and the lowdown - as you perceive it - of where the anthrax originated?
Unless I know what you think happened, I am unable to effectively respond to your question since you seem to ignore all of the answers that are in opposition to whatever your pre-conceived opinion is.

2007-06-23 17:16:16 · answer #7 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 0 2

Because jet fuel was not the only thing flammable in the buildings. I'll bet you believe almost all the conspiracy theories. Hey, did you know that the last five presidents where actually aliens from the planet Uranus.

2007-06-23 17:11:48 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

The world is flat and sex will make you go blind....."oh" "oh" I got one, frogs will give you warts.

2007-06-23 17:17:26 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers