English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I would! It is my sincerest hope that he runs. Our nation needs him now more than ever.

http://www.algore.org

2007-06-23 16:38:12 · 9 answers · asked by Sofishortss 3 in Politics & Government Elections

9 answers

No. I didn't before and I won't now.

2007-06-23 17:32:23 · answer #1 · answered by bbmecum 3 · 1 1

The only way he could it make now is on a third party ticket. Say the Green Party or Independent.

The republicans would love that because it would only serve to sap away votes from the democratic nominee (whomever that will be).

Here's a thought though... What if Ron Paul places a close 2nd in the Republican Primaries and gets snubbed when the winner selects his running mate. A disaffected Paul then announces his intention to run as an Independent and asks Al to join him as his running-mate.
I think that would make a pretty strong ticket, sapping votes from both the Rep and Dem parties, don't you?

2007-06-23 21:54:26 · answer #2 · answered by V-Starion 5 · 0 1

I would absolutley vote for Al Gore. He won the Presidency once before and I believe he can win it again. I think he has the ability to bring our nation closer together and to help heal the gaping wound G.W. Bush has ripped open.

2007-06-23 17:32:13 · answer #3 · answered by little timmie 3 · 2 1

Al Gore became into area of the subject - he became into area of the Clinton administration that did not foresee terrorism being a controversy sooner or later, did not choose to circulate after Osama whilst they had him of their attractions... Al Gore has not had an unique theory because of fact the 1980's. he's previous college politics - does not comprehend his very own innovations, and if he did, does not have the potential to speak what became into in that addled head. once you say which you long for the fulfillment of the ninety's - purely undergo in innovations it became into because of fact Ronald Reagan and the Republicans geared up up our nationwide protection to the component that we've been risk-free, till bill and Al got here upon it mandatory to dismantle it. those 2 spent all of their time sweating out their in one day approval scores, and taking credit for a reliable financial gadget they had not something to do with arising - Reagan's tax cuts and the dismantling of the Soviet Union helped enable for that. would desire to you think of the wailing and the gnashing of the teeth that would desire to have taken place if a Republican were in the White abode whilst the tech bubble burst? we could nevertheless be dealing with Enron like trials and all varieties of investigations... i don't see a single Dem with any guts or backbone or smarts adequate to do the activity. Al Gore could have had us sign in to that ridiculous Kyoto treaty that would desire to have handicapped each US industry and thrown us into the dark an prolonged time... you've gotten Al, do purely not unharness that loser at something persons. You liberal Democrats have confident your self that 9/eleven became into an anomoly which will not be able to take place lower back, and it became into your reckless, selfish stupidity that allowed that to take place in the 1st place. All bill's humorous business enterprise with China is explanation why the huge silos grew up betwixt the CIA and FBI - because of fact they had the dirt on bill. the female who drew up the protocol so as that the two businesses would desire to not refer to a minimum of one yet another had the gall to sit down down on the 9/eleven value and blame Bush for all of it - Democrats are disloyal, and don't belong working this usa. Al Gore, please circulate re-invent the internet, yet depart this great usa on my own.

2016-11-07 07:57:54 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

For what to embarrass this nation some more the last thing we need is more of Gore The man is a moronic liar and I consider him to be more pathetic than his buddy Clinton

2007-06-23 17:37:17 · answer #5 · answered by cowboyjim376 2 · 1 1

I might. But his "window of opportunity" is closing. And I'm not entirely sure that he (& WE) - wouldn't be "better off" it he remained as our Champion against Global Warming. He's doing a stellar job, and seems to be enjoying himself, too. After what he's "been through"- being President mightn't be as much "fun". :)

2007-06-23 18:10:38 · answer #6 · answered by Joseph, II 7 · 1 0

VP with Hillary

2007-06-23 17:33:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

.No! He is a pompous self-serving, deceitful, bitter politician who would further degenerate the Country

2007-06-23 21:19:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

AG is a fat asshole and you know it...!

2007-06-23 18:04:15 · answer #9 · answered by marky_ohh 2 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers