You can only be a great team if the opponent you beat is also a great team. The cavs were a worthy foe for the spurs. So the cavs are not losers they gave it all they had. The spurs were just better.
2007-06-23 15:44:14 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Basketball
so whats your question? you just wasted 5 points trying to prove a point
2007-06-23 16:08:41 · answer #1 · answered by youcantfeelthe_heat 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I really think that the Cavs are here to stay as they lost four games NBA Finals games by an average of 5 points pet game in the four game sweap.
Losers are never remembered in history.
Yes, Cleveland gave the Spurs a hard time with the Spurs winning close games by single digits in Games One and Two, and by 3 points in Game Three, and by 1 point in Game Four.
The Spurs never blew Cleveland out. Just as Cleveland was making a run in each of the fourth quarters, the Spurs experience would score just enough points to pull away with a victory.
Cleveland will be back in the Finals if they keep the same team intact. I know that sports analysts were easy at writiing off Cleveland as the worst team ever in the NBA Finals. To the contrary, Cleveland had a very good team.
Cleveland was a worthy foe, just young and inexperienced.
Losers are never remembered, so losing even in a NBA Finals losing never achieves anything unless a team wins the NBA Finals and the NBA ring.
2007-06-24 03:21:31 · answer #2 · answered by Score 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Cavs, are a good team I mean LBJ is a good team. LBJ had no help, to the 1-2 punch of most teams the cavs had a 1-6 punch. Are they good? No they are a bit above average.
Winning the east is no big accomplishment. I bet the bottom 4 post season western teams would dominate in the east. Keep in mind Cavs played more games against the eastern teams than they did against the west (50-32) so the win/loss numbers are inflated.
Are they losers? NO, Are they great? NO They are above average. LBJ took em to the finals with no help and they played with heart and put their souls in to the playoffs, thats commendable. They did the best they could do and that should be respected.
2007-06-24 02:20:16 · answer #3 · answered by Mavs rule 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The Cavs are Eastern Conference champions. Some believe that the Pistons are better opponents for the Spurs. I don't think so, the Pistons couldn't beat the Cavs on their own series.
It just happens, one conference champ has to go home loser at the Finals. But we should never forget that they are still champs.
2007-06-27 09:41:08 · answer #4 · answered by aka_zidane 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am not trying to be mean cause' the cavs are my favorite team and james is my friggin hero but sadly sometimes you just have to admit it the cavs lost they got swept in the finals which absolutely sucks so whether u want to say the cavs didnt lose the spurs were better or just say the cavs lost they still lost it doesnt change anything all we can do is hope for next year.
2007-06-23 22:55:05 · answer #5 · answered by Nick S 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Don;t beat the Cavs too much. James just needs to mature. He alone is not a team and he needs to learn that he needs four other players on the floor with him. Cavs have some good young talent besides James. They need a good big man in the middle and with Gibson, James and the Serbian that I can not remember how to spell his name they will be honest contenders in about three years.
2007-06-26 08:44:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Cavs suck, the Pistons just choked or maybe they didn't want another finals appearance where they knew they were going to lose.
And for the loser under me, the Spurs and the Mavs are my teams and one of my favorite teams whooped the s.hit out of your team with a sweep, only proving that the cavs did not belong in the finals, would the Pistons have gotten swept, No.
2007-06-23 23:09:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
How can some of you people say the cavs suck? Where was your team? The pistons didn't choke, they got BEAT. So what if they got swept. It was their first year there. Obviously some of you don't know a thing about b-ball. No the cavs are not a great team, but they made it to the finals. It takes time to make a great team. The time is coming soon. WITNESS!!!
2007-06-24 00:25:30 · answer #8 · answered by C'town4ever 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
They wernt worthy for the spurs. they got swept. They got lucky they got out of the east. The Bulls inexperiance killed them, Nets should of been good but wernt, the raptors r 2 young, wiz lost gilbert and the heat r 2 old. o ya the pistons just choked
2007-06-23 23:04:10 · answer #9 · answered by slicknj13 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The Cavs are just young and inexperienced, but they played with all their heart, and earned everyone's respect.
2007-06-23 22:55:52 · answer #10 · answered by I|A|X 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
well to be quite honest with you im so sick of seing the Spurs dominate basketball that i wouldve sold my soul to the devil to see the Cavs win..
well hey theres always next year ;)
2007-06-23 22:55:15 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋