Daniel Beck, the Lead Investigator of the McMahon case, said that a third strand of DNA was found at the crime scene of a well-known personality. Ok, you must think hard about it, think. The bombing occurred on the night of the Draft, a conjunction of Raw, Smackdown and ECW, ok. Now, he said it was a well-known personality, and a personality is sometimes what, a radio or television announcer, personality=WWE announcers. Ok, stay with me, there have been many WWE announcers in the past of WWE, Mean Gene, Gorrilla Monsoon, many well known announcers. But who would be so devious as to kill Vince, IT WAS PAUL HEYMAN, think about it, Vince has fired him so many times, Vince bought ECW and put him out of business, then brought him in as an announcer, then fired him again. THEN, he brought him in as the Smackdown annoncer, then fired him again, then, after Vince revived ECW, he fired Paul Heyman, who was the GM, earlier this year, he has the best motive, it was DEFINATELY Paul Heyman!!!??!!!
2007-06-23 14:48:02 · 16 answers · asked by DaBadGuy4Lyfe2Sweet 3 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
I know he isn't really dead, I mean Paul Heyman killed him in the storylines, duh.
2007-06-23 15:36:35 · update #1
Ha ha!
2007-06-23 14:52:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, he wasn't much of a wrestler, whether that was set up by design or not, I'm not sure, but Vince McMahon, even though he had all the muscles, typically took a beating to most of the superstars he would fight in the ring! I think mainly because people wanted to see that, he is a great performer with the Mr. McMahon character, but I don't think he could of out wrestled anyone good on his roster, his character was getting humilitated by Steve Austin most of the time, but it worked, and I give Vince McMahon Credit for not being afraid to show weakness in the ring and during his rivalry with Austin, people wanted to see Austin get the best of McMahon, if McMahon had an ego, that wouldn't of happen, the performance wouldn't of worked!
2016-05-18 22:44:21 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Paul Heyman seems logical.
The person who killed Vince obiviously has to be someone powerful like Ted Tuner, Donald Trump, Paul Heyman, or Shane McMahon. Paul Heyman would have the most motives (on screen), and it certainly would increase the ratings for ECW if Paul was the one who did it, because he'd be appearing there a lot.
2007-06-23 14:58:21 · answer #3 · answered by Rain. 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
But how come when I read the McMahon bio on Wikepedia today June 23, there is no reference to his passing. More contrived wrestling lore
2007-06-23 15:10:39 · answer #4 · answered by Michael M 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yea maybe its him...or Jonathan Coachman, Donald Trump, Stone Cold, the limo driver, or those 2 guys that kept laughing and staring at Vince outside, any one of these people can be the person who killed him...(storyline)
2007-06-26 00:14:13 · answer #5 · answered by mexican_boy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
first of all thats not a question...second of all, wrestling is FAKE nothing about it is real its all an act nobody really dies deal with the fact that ur whole obsession with this sport is pointless bc its all staged
2007-06-23 14:56:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
um hes not dead dont you realize how fake it is? when vince went in that limozine dont yuou notice how long it took him to close it? and if he would of really died the cameraman wouldnt be that stupid to where he just stands there and doesnt do a thing.
2007-06-23 14:59:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Ok, I confess, I did it. I just could not stand to see that stupid walk he does anymore.
2007-06-24 01:30:29 · answer #8 · answered by Ellen K 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You actually put up a good argument there champ!
2007-06-23 14:56:35 · answer #9 · answered by Jim#1 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you got a point they might pin it on him and say he did it (part of the storyline)
2007-06-23 14:52:58 · answer #10 · answered by This Guy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋