Or would you prefer the city life ???
2007-06-23 12:07:29 · 9 answers · asked by Rita 6 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
I've spent much time on the beaches in Baja (Cabo San Lucas) & where I live, beaches, snow, forests are all so close by. But forever? A redwood forest. Definitely. Awesome, profound, beautiful. I lived in San Francisco for awhile, & "city life" can be quite fun. But just in "doses." Forever! Wow. If you've ever been in a redwood forest, especially on a moonlit night, & all alone, perhaps you'd understand. Serenity, insight. I think you're more of a "fun" person, & the beach would appeal more to you!
2007-06-23 13:32:54 · answer #1 · answered by Valac Gypsy 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'd love a beach. provided there are trees for shade, mountains behind the beach, a creek or river nearby, and a hammock between two trees. No sharks or jellyfish or stonefish in the water, and a great surf. A plain hot beach is not for me.
2007-06-23 20:08:40 · answer #2 · answered by henry d 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no, give me the city anytime.
i did live by the beach for years, and don't miss it for the world.
and i lived on the river for eight years.
it's the best place to live, especially if you are in a city that you love.
2007-06-23 19:14:56 · answer #3 · answered by mary i 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'd want somewhere wide open and comfortably cool with times of downright cold. No beaches, they have too much sand and too much salt for my tastes.
2007-06-23 19:11:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i live in between the city and country and love it!
2007-06-23 19:12:17 · answer #5 · answered by ♥Charmed One♥ 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i would rather live for 90 fun years and die happy on my life beach.
2007-06-23 23:44:24 · answer #6 · answered by idea monster 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Neither. I like the country.
2007-06-23 19:11:04 · answer #7 · answered by yeahyeah 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'd live in Alva, Oklahoma.
2007-06-23 19:13:00 · answer #8 · answered by the slightly amusing answers of 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Forever & ever .
2007-06-23 19:21:44 · answer #9 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋