English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

When you watch the video footage you can clearly see his wife retreaveing a portion of his skull off of the trunk of the car. Any body knows the a gun shot from behind would cause a large exit wound in the front of the skull. That did not happen. If Jackie is retrieveing a portion of his skull from the trunck than he was shot from the front or the side not the back. What do you think?

2007-06-23 07:22:07 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Government

23 answers

Yes. There is not one shred of credible evidence to indicate any other possibility. Phony theories have abounded for over 40 years, and none of them is widely accepted.

2007-06-23 07:26:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

According to the book, "Mortal Error", there were two shooters. One was Oswald. Two was a Secret Service agent who accidentally fired his AR-15 rifle when the car he was in traveled over a bump while he held the rifle with the safety off and his finger on the trigger. The agent (and the car) were behind JFK. Oswald was doing damage, but the coup-de-grace was a fluke which was fired by accident. THAT FLUKE is what the government has been covering up or trying to discredit for years. Allegedly, the Secret Service accidentally shot the President of the United States during Oswalds attack on JFK. The author of "Mortal Error" arrived at his conclusions based upon acoustical analysis. The AR-15 and the Caracano rifle do not make the same sounds. The directions the sounds came from were not the same.

2016-05-18 03:24:35 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Every study done by experts, and another was done just in the last five years, has proven it was a one man operation with the shots being fired from the Texas School Depository. Do you actually know the piece of skull Jackie was going after from a distant views we have, no. In a moving vehicle even something from the front of his head would fly to the rear of the car. I don't even want to go into all the sites that can prove you wrong you just need to look on the Internet to reputable sources. Plus the one question that it comes down to with the love that Robert and Ted had for their brother and the power both had in DC do you think either with the courage they showed on issues important to them that they would not sniff out a conspiracy that killed their brother? Quit being a conspiracy wacko.

2007-06-23 07:39:47 · answer #3 · answered by ALASPADA 6 · 0 1

Obviously if Jackie picked up the rear half of his skull off the trunk of the limo, common sense dictates that he was hit in the forehead area with a high powered rifle...The whole Oswald thing proves how hypnotized and close-minded the American public was up until 1964, when a little known citizen named Zapruder introduced film-footage of the tragedy and brought the "magic-bullet" theory into play...

2007-06-23 07:53:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Even the 1978 House Select Committee report that re-investigated the matter concluded there was a high probability that the assassination was not by one man, but accomplished through a conspiracy.

"In 1978 the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) concluded that there was probably a conspiracy involved in the assassination of President Kennedy(1), a conclusion primarily based on the acoustic evidence contained on the Dallas Police Department radio recordings."

Just a couple months ago, a NEW acoustic recording was found, and this one should conclusively prove the conspiracy theory.

Speaking of conspiracy theories, here is my own extremely wacky one (that has nothing to do with Fidel Castro, the CIA, organized crime, etc.)

Peter Lawford was one of Marilyn Monroe's closest friends. It is very likely that Kennedy had her murdered; she did not commit suicide. She was in fact planning to re-marry Joe DiMaggio, and was looking forward to the second half of her movie career with even better, more mature parts.

So, here's my own wacky theory (probably 100% wrong):Peter Lawford discovered the government tricked him. He was furious because one of his closest friends was dead. On the night Marilyn "committed suicide" he was supposed to go back to her apartment and rescue her from the drug overdose. Something happened. Either one of JFK's men tricked Lawford into thinking Kennedy had already arranged for Marilyn to get help, or maybe they convinced Lawford that Marilyn was a threat to national security (she had threatened JFK with revealing state secrets after their love affair soured).

In a coincidence worthy of Charles Dickens, Peter Lawford vowed revenge. It was easy in those days to find unsavory characters in Hollywood, so he hired some gunmen to kill Kennedy. By sheer coincidence he chose the same day and approximately same place that Lee Harvey Oswald had chosen (but this is very logical: how many motorcade chances do you get, huh?........ in retrospect, it would seem unusual if someone DIDN'T try to shoot a President while he's a sitting duck in an open air car).

2007-06-23 08:06:28 · answer #5 · answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7 · 2 0

It has been added to the Urban Legends list like those suicides surrounding the Clinton era's. As Gov and President. The Body Count which was revised shortly after Hillary announced she was running. It still details those that died by gunshot wounds to the back of the head and they were ruled suicide.
Funny, in his book WJ likens himself to the young Kennedy.
I have always wondered about the CSI stuff that made no sense. I watched so many documentry's on JFK and read alot about it. Nothing adds up/NEITHER do. Thank you.

2007-06-23 07:36:49 · answer #6 · answered by Mele Kai 6 · 0 0

No of course I don't think that. A lone gunman please, don't be ridiculous. It was obviously a carefully orchestrated plot by the CIA, Kennedy was never supposed to be President. He wouldn't have been if his father hadn't bought votes for him in key places.

"The American people don't read." - Former CIA director Allen Dulles, speaking about how the American people would respond to the inconsistencies in the Warren Commission report on the JFK assasination

"The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists." - J. Edgar Hoover

2007-06-23 07:29:37 · answer #7 · answered by Stephanie is awesome!! 7 · 1 0

I still believe we need to reimplement the silver and gold currency standard. Might want to take a good look into why i'm exactly saying this. Se exactly what LBJ did as well while in office. It's bigger than Northwoods.

Except there's only one dilemma that intrigues me as well. Why Robert?

2007-06-23 07:34:59 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't buy the fact that Oswald did it. I believe it was done by our own government because those in the shadows wanted to secretly stage a coup. Did you see the "grassy knoll" area in Dallas? I did. Go see it if you need further information.

2007-06-23 08:01:34 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

not at all I read some pretty compelling evidence pointing at Richard Nixon this week..if you would look at the time line
in this submission..by a Washington Post reporter
http://crimemagazine.com/03/richardnixon,1014.htm

you'll see he only uses allegedly..and ostensibly in two seperate references..then the rest sourced fact..

the timeline is at the very end of the piece.

2007-06-23 07:40:58 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

JFK pissed off a lot of powerful people, especially with after he rejected operation Northwoods and fired many top officials who came up with the sick idea.

2007-06-23 07:29:33 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers