I'm with the other two before me.....
Go on thumbs down...go on ....
2007-06-23 07:12:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by masonv80 3
·
3⤊
3⤋
Should have gone years ago, think of the lives that would have saved.
2007-06-23 12:16:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
What a complimentary selection of answers ,couldn't have put it better ...thumbs up for everyone.
Lets just hope that his replacement isn't as useless as him ,but I wont hold my breath.
2007-06-23 08:30:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by ǝuoʎʞɔɐʍ 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think Tony can't handle Bush's crap anymore so he will just leave the bastard to face the world by himself.he's tired doing stupidies he maybe as stupid as Bush
2007-06-23 07:26:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by angel_speak2000 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
notice how he sold us out to europe as his leaving present to the u k on his last few days in office what a coward .this period will be remembered with shame ,the time when the uk lost its self belief and surrendered to spin and political bull ****.
2007-06-23 07:13:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
No - the evil, lying, conniving corrupt toe-rag should have left 4 years ago. In fact he should NEVER have become Prime Minister in the first place.
2007-06-23 07:07:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 5
·
3⤊
3⤋
Blair spent too much time sniffing up W's ****.
2007-06-23 07:55:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by nora22000 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
He`s cocked it up for this long why not let someone else come in and **** it up even more
2007-06-23 12:10:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by kelly m 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
should have gone years....n stand trial for war crimes....he is a criminal and a disgrace as a leader.....the idiot is a total failure
2007-06-23 07:08:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
it is time for him to go, and get some religion.
2007-06-23 14:53:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋