Just wondering, just give your opinion... don't get angry or i will report u...
2007-06-23 07:01:21 · 26 answers · asked by Lexington 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Thank you all for ur opinons... that is all i needed... Thanks!!!
2007-06-23 11:34:00 · update #1
He is a good president.
How would you, ( or I, or anybody else )react to the problems he is facing??
2007-06-23 07:06:16 · answer #1 · answered by TedEx 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Really well when Clinton was president we had a balanced budget, others countries respected him, most countries think Bush is a clown, same here. As far as you thinking he is a good president that your choice and that is OK with me. People can like who they like. and if I was angry who would u report me too the Yahoo police that is so stupid, people have a right to express their anger and if you a just looking for people to agree with you, then do not ask the type of question that you will not get the responce you want.
2007-06-23 08:10:14 · answer #2 · answered by sassassgirlusa 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
He lies too much. If he really believed in what he was doing, he wouldn't feel the need to constantly defend himself and try to persuade people. I don't like the way he talks, trying to persuade people the way he does.
He has a macho attitude which is really unappealing. It's like he's distant. He's not really there. He's just sort of controlling things from a distance without really caring about people.
His family doesn't seem very bright. His wife killed her classmate by running a stop sign when she was in high school. His daughters don't do anything special and aren't in the military. Because he's such a militaristic leader, it would give a lot more credit to his cause if his own children were at as much risk as the people sent to Iraq are.
Bill Clinton could be a goof too, and fairly egotistical, but he didn't plain ignore his country. I don't know enough about Hillary to comment on her.
Bush's English usage is really poor. Again, it's like he's distant. He's not really there. It shouldn't be such a struggle to speak clearly.
2007-06-23 07:13:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I think Bush is a liar, and is only useing the position of President to advance his circle of friends oppertunity for money making at the price of the lives of the poor in this country and around the world, and should be rembered as one of the biggest terrorist of All Time
2007-06-23 07:24:13 · answer #4 · answered by mike109street 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I dont hate him, but I think he used the Christian right to his advantage. Theres really no way to guage his administration because he is the first to strike back on terror, eventhough he is going about it bassackwerds If there is a crook in the WH it sh be Cheney. I think he was the catalyst for going into Iraq in the first place. I tell you one thing He beats Gore & numnads Kerry all over the place. By all rights, Bush shouldnt have been the first president to combat terror, it should have been Clinton. (ie The USS Cole, bombing of the towers in the early 90's)
2007-06-23 07:16:26 · answer #5 · answered by Job1000 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't hate him.The man is probably the worst President the US has ever had.
The US is never going to be popular in the world but with his policies he has brought what little respect the country may have had down to almost zero.
The man is incompetent.How do you turn a trade surplus of some 230 BILLION dollars into a trade deficit of 230 BILLION dollars in such a short space of time.
His foreign policies have been a disaster and have only served to alienate and endanger the US further.
2007-06-23 07:19:27 · answer #6 · answered by rosbif 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I wish that he hadn't turned the world against us.
I wish he didn't smirk at times when a more reasoned or compassionate response would be appropriate.
I wish he could communicate in complete sentences that come from the heart - rather than the teleprompter.
Do I hate him? No.
Do I wish he worked as a manager of a Wal-Mart department such as men's hosiery where similar-intellect powered individuals are employed? - Absolutely!
2007-06-23 07:28:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Puleeeease do not report me, but Clinton was able to erase the national debt, the country was very prosperous during his administration and we were not engaged in a long-term occupation of two third-world countries.
Bush has put our national debt in the trillions, exposed our service men to death and injury for years, and the unemployment rate has risen as much as gas prices.
Thus, Clinton was the better president.
2007-06-23 07:09:30 · answer #8 · answered by MenifeeManiac 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
How about you explain to people why you think he is a good president instead of just saying that you think he is a good president? If he is a good president, you should be able to provide numerous flawless examples of his "excellent" leadership.
2007-06-23 07:19:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
There are just a whole lot of hateful people out there nowadays and most of them are on the far-left. They FEEL so secure in the knowledge that they are RIGHT about EVERYTHING so hating George Bush just comes naturally to them.
Actually, I don't think they really "hate" Bush - no, what they hate are their sad, pathetic lives and they direct that self-hatred outwards in the faint hope that somehow it will make them FEEL better. But, of course, it doesn't.
You are quite correct in your observation that Bush is a way better president than Clinton was. Clinton was a nothing nobody who won't climb out of the bottom one-third of presidents once all of his fans and apologists have died off.
2007-06-23 07:08:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 6⤋
"Dont get angry or I will report you" ?
Who are you, the mood police?
I think only a person who does no reading whatsoever could ask a question like yours. Do a little research and find out why even republicans are running from the Bush administration as fast as they can. NObody supports him anymore based on his miserably failed domestic policies and his stupid, pointless and damaging foreign policy. Besides - he is barely functioning as literate.
2007-06-23 07:07:25 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋