..blew her own trumpet and never missed an opportunity to pose for the cameras while "being a saint"
2007-06-23 04:28:37 · 26 answers · asked by eddie 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Why be like that????????
The woman is dead leave her alone will ya
2007-06-23 04:30:43 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
She was a stupid hick. Now she is a dead stupid hick.
She only began to do visible charity work after she began to fade into obscurity following her divorce with Charles. It was painfully obvious that the woman had no education, no intelligence, and no intellectual or artistic curiousity whatsoever. I suspect she never had a thought in that head of hers, which she used mostly for eating and wearing hats. Ahh, you might say, but she had a kind heart. Did she? She didn't even have the minimal mental capacity needed to distinguish between kindness and cruelty. And accordingly, since she couldn't possibly understand the issues she was supposedly working with, all of her "charity" was nothing more than a series of publicity stints.
She was the queen of glurge, who promoted a culture in which the highest form of virtue is swimming in saccharine dregs of superficial "goodness" without having to understand the world.
(Disclaimer to my British friends: I love you, guys. I know I have hurt the feelings of some of you with these statements, and for that I am sorry. I did not trash Princess Diana because she was British. In fact, to my outsider's eye, she couldn't be less British even if she tried. I hope not all of you are worshipping her tacky pictures as if they were idols of Amun Ra. And if you do, think about this: at the end of the day, Di's exquisite "taste in fashion" was subsidized with your tax money. When was the last time YOU wore a Valentino gown? How hypocritical is it to weep over the inadequacy of governmental subsidies to the poor and the downtrodden while taking a bite out of the public fisc to buy shmattehs?)
2007-06-25 14:43:49 · answer #2 · answered by Rеdisca 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
she was considered as a great humanitarian just because she really was a great humanitarian and she was helping people. Anyway, I was young back then so I don't really remember all this, but enough to know that she was a good person- not a 'saint', but good.
2007-06-23 11:38:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
You miss the point. You are confused. weather she was or wasnt do you feel you know enough to make a question and a statement like that? Question?? ok. Statement?? poor show.
your gunna get blasted for this one and know you dont care about that. The next question is.... do you really care weather Diana was good or not? I believe you have little knowledge on the matter and your just trying to incite bad reactions.
2007-06-23 11:37:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think she was a great humanitarian. She was involved in over 150 different charities all over the world. she also gave grants to organizations championing charitable causes, advocacy, and she campaigned awareness-raising events. she worked to secure improvements in the lives of disadvantaged people around the world.
2007-06-23 11:36:33 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think you're right. She was a famous man's wife. That's the only reason we even know she existed. When he ditched her, what claim to fame had she? None. So deploy some big money (she was wealthy after that), get the publicity machine rolling, talking about "she's a person of peace" etc to guarantee her PR immortality.
I think it says a lot that she died in a fast drive back from a disco at 3 in the morning with a limo full of gigolos and coke sniffers.
2007-06-23 11:33:44 · answer #6 · answered by Mr. Vincent Van Jessup 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
She is one because she is one, with the exception of William, I've never seen any of the other members of the British Monarch refuse to travel with bodyguards to war-torn countrys, sleep and eat as the natives would, and actually help test for landmines themselves, and I doubt there is a single person here who could say that.
The only people who slag one of the greatest people of the 20th Century off are those who were jealous of her, and realise they could never become half the person she was, and still is.
2007-06-23 11:32:10 · answer #7 · answered by Scott Bull 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
shes considered a great humanitarian because she knew it would take someone high profile such as herself to break down barriers, beliefs and stigma over such issues as AIDS and Leprosy.I don't recall her blowing her own trumpet as you put it.She wasn't claiming to be a saint and only ever spoke out to encourage others to do the same.
2007-06-23 11:33:13 · answer #8 · answered by snikleback 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Seems like you have no idea of what she did. She was the first to touch and have contacts with HIV positive people at a time when those people were regarded as having a disease worse than the plague. She had no choice but to be on camera as they would never leave her alone. Look at what she accomplished before you judge.
2007-06-23 11:32:42 · answer #9 · answered by Miss T 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You have a really weird obsession. You should see a therapist.
I thought she did some wonderful things for people. Why don't you go out and make the world a better place?
She is gone. Have some respect and leave her to rest.
2007-06-23 11:36:10 · answer #10 · answered by xoɟ ʍous 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
princess diana was a nice woman,you shouldnt speak ill of the dead , she might just haunt you.she had to put up with a lot of stress ,with camera nutters.considering they were the cause of her death. she was a saint. your opinion is a silly remark in itself.
2007-06-27 08:14:12 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋