English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Or would your fear of appearing "gay" even in an emergency situation let you both freeze to death?

2007-06-23 02:08:35 · 5 answers · asked by topink 6 in Social Science Psychology

5 answers

Of course I would, I'm in the army and straight as a die, and know well the dangers of exposure and hypothermia.

There comes a point when staying alive, becomes much more important than what people think and freezing to death. And sharing a sleeping bag with another human regardless of gender will save your life.

You just don't EVER MENTION IT AGAIN afterwards.

2007-06-23 02:22:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

A book I read about male sexual habits confirmed that all men in groups, use one another for sexual purposes. The author quoted some Brazilian men up country and miles from civlization, who were all sexually active among themselves like sailors. He said the men would have been insulted if they were called *******.

Incidentally, the expression '*******' comes from the 300 year witch burnings in Europe. (All neatly brushed historically under the carpet), where the witchfinder generals bound the homsexuals together, to burn at the bottom of the pyre, to help burn the women.

2007-06-23 09:23:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Nope, straight guys would find another manly way to get worm, perhaps build a fire before snuggling. We would only share body heat if it was life or death.

2007-06-23 09:15:40 · answer #3 · answered by dazmac1 2 · 0 1

of course, but i wouldn't look on it as snuggling.

2007-06-23 13:04:19 · answer #4 · answered by catalyist 3 · 0 0

NO. I'd rather freeze to death than do that.

2007-06-23 09:18:18 · answer #5 · answered by Mr_realist 3 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers