As a 43 year old architect, I've explained in here a good dozen times why the towers came down, as well as explaining the demise of bldg 7. Yet for all of the engineering and architectural axioms I can offer (as well as explanations that I've read by other professionals offered in these forums) they STILL refuse to believe in factual science.
What are you all looking for? And please dont waste your time or mine typing out "I want the truth" because 'the truth' has been offered to you a thousand times and you still rail against it.
2007-06-23 02:00:05 · 23 answers · asked by vinny_says_relax 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Hey I'm with you regarding the towers. But for me the Pentagon remains this really bizarre incident. We have all seen the pictures and there is no plane. The government won't release the Virginia DOT and gas station security cam videos that would prove it.
When something stinks....it stinks.
2007-06-23 12:44:18 · answer #1 · answered by KERMIT M 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Another investigation; with professionals from various types of educational backgrounds, as well as people who have alot of experience in their field. Also, a chance for people who have the same type of experience and education, to be able to ask questions as well as participate at a later time. The USA has not utilized it's greatest resources since 9-11; and that is it's citizens who may want to participate, or simply ask questions. There has been no forum created for this; and it is quite overdue.
Conspiracy or concern develops in a vaccuum.
2007-06-23 10:19:55 · answer #2 · answered by dollysj 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Why, how can you ask such a Naive question?
They seek the "Truth" of course.
Because it just isn't possible that 9/11 was caused by some PO'd Islamofacists, who's only purpose is to bring an end to western culture and move us back to the 6th century.
Nope, it's all BushCo's fault.
/sarc off
My friend, you might as well talk to a wall, you will get about as far, and actually the answers you get from said wall will probably make more sense.
2007-06-23 09:09:18 · answer #3 · answered by Mark A 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
It has already been proven by analyzing samples of of the WTC towers that there were explosives involved. Vinny unless you had samples then you are no different than others that have their own conspiracy theorists. You are a conspiracy theorists yourself.
It is obvious that the towers were controlled demolitions. It was everyone's first thoughts and it is still every rational thinking person's thought today. It is no longer a debate.
What we really want is the people of the world is to realize that America is capable and willing to commit false flags and kill its own people to gain control over us and to get public support for invading countries.
There are some of us who can see through the propaganda. Propaganda and mind control and can even affect intelligent and educated people. Hitler used propaganda and mind control too. Some of us actually learn from history. We're just trying to prevent America from going down the same route as Nazi Germany.
2007-06-23 11:23:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Vinny the truth has been thwarted, as the former commissioner of the 9/11 commission WHO RESIGNED stated, "this investigation has been compromised".
Senator Max Cleland – Former member of the 9/11 Commission, resigned in December 2003. Currently serves on the board of directors of the Export-Import Bank of the United States. U.S. Senator from Georgia 1997 - 2002. Secretary of State of Georgia 1982 - 1996. Administrator of the U.S. Veterans Administration 1977 - 1981. Former Captain, U.S. Army. Awarded Silver Star and Bronze Star for bravery in Viet Nam. Triple amputee from war injuries.
Article New York Times 10/26/03: "As each day goes by, we learn that this government knew a whole lot more about these terrorists before Sept. 11 than it has ever admitted." http://www.commondreams.org
Article Boston Globe 11/13/03: "If this decision stands [to limit access to White House documents], I, as a member of the [9/11] Commission, cannot look any American in the eye, especially family members of victims, and say the Commission had full access. This investigation is now compromised."
2007-06-23 09:07:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋
Thank you Barbara L, and Superpolitics, and David T. Your answers are all really great! Hopefully, what you have said here will at least open one or two peoples eyes! What the Popular Mechanics crowd seem to regard as truth, and factual science is nothing more than lame propaganda, and the proponents of such lame propaganda, just can't handle the fact that not everyone is susceptible to brainwashing! We don't want to end up as Stepford like, internment prisoners, in a fascist police state....and we will continue fighting the good fight until we breathe our last breath. Our numbers are also growing, and the propaganda proponents cannot stand that either. *sm*
2007-06-23 09:27:30 · answer #6 · answered by LadyZania 7 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Justice. To be honest 911 was just the beginning of the end. You are still hiding in "the good old days" when logic and common sense ran your nation.
Personally, I am so tired of debating the obvious with people who are fully blinkered, that I figure they will learn what happened when they are ready to hear the truth. Why waste my precious time on them when the evidence is so high. I am, btw, mocking that famous line of his mothers, Barbara, who when asked about body bags said, "Why should I waste my beautiful mind considering such drivel?"
And face it, kiddo, the truth is available only to those who have their ears open. You don't want to see it, prefer to hide behind the safeness of a report written by KISSINGER, the butcher of millions? A man known around the world for his duplicity and evil doing? Fine,... believe.
Turning your eyes from the painful truth seems to work for you for now. Enjoy your innocence while it lasts. The bubble will be popped soon.
You state you do not want the truth because you deny it in your question, so why bother arguing? Your mind is made up. Now, I will move on and write something relevant to the world and leave such naivete behind for now. It is a nice fantasy world...
I imagine you think the idea of the micro chip, boxcars with shackles and the 200 000+ guillotines that have been ordered from China are good ideas too. And yes, I have pictorial proof of every thing I say, as well as many many witnesses reports. So, you just live in your fantasy for now, sweetums.
2007-06-23 09:07:18 · answer #7 · answered by Noor al Haqiqa 6 · 5⤊ 5⤋
The real 9/11 Conspiracy Subscribers wish you would believe that Building 7 fell because of vibration, wind and debris, that every service industry was an utmost failure on that day, and that they wouldn't seek justice against the person who claimed he organized the attack because we respect a country's sovereignty while there is evidence of otherwise.
2007-06-23 09:30:25 · answer #8 · answered by Roy 4 · 2⤊ 4⤋
I think it's just an explanation for a tragedy they dont understand how other human beings could do.
Some are just paranoid and think everyones out to get them
I wonder what % of conspiracy theorists also believe in alien abductions
2007-06-23 09:15:36 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
No what your offering is facts.
Facts for a "Truther" is like spinach to my nephew. It might be the best thing to eat and put in to your body but he spits it out because it does not fit in to what he thinks taste good.
"Truthers" don't want facts they want to find any proof that the Government is evil and trying to bring some kind of fascist dictatorship to the world. and facts are not going to stand in their way.
and until they find that "Truth" they will not believe facts.
your trying to change the course of a river with a spoon I am afraid.
You are also expecting logic in people who constantly show they lack reason and logic on a constant and never ending basis.
I still try to occasionally poke holes in the "truther" statements that get posted but I realized it was hopeless a long time ago.
2007-06-23 09:21:23 · answer #10 · answered by Stone K 6 · 2⤊ 5⤋