ok ALEXANDER tried to do this dream long ago so did the romans, {rome did it in the way} US has that chance the first thing to do is unite canada and the US invade brition, Now the Us has the largest navy and best trained infanty force in the world. Take latin america it would only take about 15 years some will surrender. take africa which most will surrender cuz they really need us now we have the largest infantry force in the world. Invade europe in a other 50 years take the rest of the world mix the language into english and so make a world police force i repuplic of states but it will take another Alexander to do so.
2007-06-23 00:50:59 · 11 answers · asked by luisg 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
The idea is good, but it will definitely not bring any peace at all. If anything, it will bring a world civil war that will no longer stop (picture current terrorism times 5 billion people).
The whole idea of peace is that people can live and organise their lives according to their own cultural habits.
The current stream of anti-americanism or terrorism is already that too many people feel the USA has a too big an influence on their lives.
Strong, age old and great cultures as the Chinese, the Muslim world, Europe (just to name a few) are too deeply settled in to make them accept to have to have to embrace 'american way of life'. I know I would not. I love the US - but in the US.
There are too many things in my country that i would die for to have them.
2007-06-23 02:55:03 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Negative - This will further alienate America from the rest of the world.And remember Alexander the Great ran an empire. All empires are bound to collapse sooner or later [different cultures/people - different interests.
2007-06-23 01:08:52 · answer #2 · answered by Chelsearose. 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ok, Genghis, Ummm. . . note. You need an army to do this. What army on earth would follow through with this plan? At best you could get a group of small mercenaries. What are you going to be, president? Even then, who would support it? Your thinking is flawed by strategy and scope yes, but it's also flawed by thinking this could every get up off the ground.
2007-06-23 01:25:07 · answer #3 · answered by Tovarish 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You like playing games like Risk, don't you?
Look, Dufus...even assuming you are correct that we could annex Central America in 15 years, what evidence do you have to suggest that the American Public has the patience to stick with it for 15 months?
And what makes you think that's even a good idea?
If you owned everything in the world, where would you keep it?
2007-06-23 01:45:31 · answer #4 · answered by open4one 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The asserting is the "the conflict to end all wars" while WW1 exceeded off it grow to be in assessment to something which had ever befell interior the history of guy. almost each u . s . on the international grow to be in touch in this violent conflict. The international places which failed to take part interior the conflict it self have been rather plagued with the aid of it. the commercial revolution of the late 1800's and early 1900 had advance the weapons of conflict plenty quicker than the approaches which the generals who would instruction manual there use. With weapons that would kill adult males at a fee no longer viewed, the militia approaches used convey approximately the deaths of tens of millions on adult males on the conflict field. It grow to be an particularly appalling to the infantrymen and civilians alike. The dying toll grow to be around sixteen million militia and civilian. With 21 million wounded. various Europe grow to be left in ruins, and almost an entire technology of adult males in Europe have been killed. not at all has destruction and dying been in this scale ever exceeded off earlier. while the conflict grow to be finally ended no longer something grow to be relatively achieved. The destruction and dying grow to be so poor futile. It grow to be believed that guy, government, and societies had discovered it rather is lesson and would not at all back sparkling up it rather is issues of conflict and violence. as long through fact the harts of adult males are crammed with desire, hate, envy, and delight there will be conflict and dying.
2016-10-03 00:18:13 · answer #5 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The United States has NO intention of colonizing the world and declaring war on all each of the countries you list. In the end, your theory would not work because there is no will behind it, no organization behind it, and no common sense behind it.
Chow!!
2007-06-23 05:28:52 · answer #6 · answered by No one 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
its really impossible because for one thing that would start another world war and with atomic bombs and so forth pretty much ends up with a destroyed planet.Also it would lead to an incredibly high death toll.Even if there were 1 nation someone is alawys going to oppose it and ruin the peace.
2007-06-23 01:02:15 · answer #7 · answered by david4194v 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ditto Aunt Cookie. Even if we consolidated under one flag, it would not be a guarantee of peace...just look at the violence that is being perpetrated inside businesses which are being attacked by their own employees.
2007-06-23 01:03:51 · answer #8 · answered by gldnsilnc 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah Go Infantry!!! Hiliarious idea
2007-06-23 06:33:12 · answer #9 · answered by m24762 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Flawed thinking on so many levels I don/t even know where to start.
2007-06-23 01:01:50 · answer #10 · answered by Big K 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋