Seashell topography divides the Subhuman species into two distinct populations which I have labelled “wackos” and “whups”. I have spent my entire Life on beaches all around the world collecting Seashells. I noticed that when I potted the portions of wackos and whups in suitable pots against the grain of their physical fibers a startling correlation is observed.
In equal large wackos outnumber whups 3 to 1 whereas in Nome the situation is reversed and Eskimos are entirely wacko (hence wackonuit).
This leads me to speculate that the wackos became dominant in northern populations as a result of the seashell trapping properties of the wacko-hereditary slow speech. Local populations of our earliest Subhuman ancestors in colder northern climates having a high wacko whup ratio were able to acquire significant quantities of rubbish which could be spun between imposable finger and thumb to make warm Pancakes. Nearer the equator the wacko architecture conveyed no advantage as Pancakes were at that time passé.Would somebody pass me the doobie?
2007-06-23 11:09:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Congratulations on excellent labeling. "Innies" vs. "outies", now why haven't I thought of that. Maybe it's because my own research blinded me to the obvious. You see, I as well have spent most of my life on the beaches of the world, collecting quantum scientific data on the elusive sandal wearing hammertoe. This is not to be confused with the most recent research published in the Journal of Amalgamated Modern Irregularities (JAMI). Side note: Topographic Organization of Eskimos (TOE) has coincidently made an unlikely last minute bid last week, and have secured the majority of shares to form a new intercontinental organization TOE-JAMI. Where was I...? Ah yes, camel toes. I like them!
2007-06-23 03:36:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
interesting research but a little wiered with the innies and the outies
2007-06-23 03:15:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by Hamed S 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Inny outy
inny outy
shake it all abouty
You knit a fluffy jumper and you turn around
The human race dies out.
Some little flowers have only ever posted two questions and they were about Oprah. Get a hobby!
2007-06-23 02:33:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
0⤋
Cute question and theory. It reminds me of the Nacirerma article from the early 80's...it was required reading in one of my intro Anthro courses. I give you a star for creativity.
2007-06-23 00:52:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by lightningelemental 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Wow, now i am wondering about how you came up with all that information, only to call it a [THEORY} inside that pin-head brain of yours'
2007-06-23 07:06:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ah, this is the question everybody hangs their laundry to dry.
2007-06-23 12:36:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by tyler durden 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Now I understand everything!!!
2007-06-23 18:33:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by poetrygal 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think you have wasted your time, energy and came up with an idea which is so stupid i can't believe i read it through all the way...it was kind of like watching a bad movie...you keep hoping it gets better in the end...but no...it didn't...perhaps you need a hobby...like carpet lint picking or something...
2007-06-23 00:12:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by Daisy 6
·
2⤊
5⤋
I think you need a hobby :)
2007-06-23 12:05:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by Chris H 3
·
0⤊
1⤋