Naw, he'd probably do worse, make them sit and listen to him preach.
2007-06-22 20:50:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ro40rd 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Mr Robertson would do no such thing. He might however hint to his many followers that anti-government sentiment should be punished in biblical proportions
"You know, I don't know about this doctrine of assassination, but if he thinks we're trying to assassinate him, I think that we really ought to go ahead and do it. It's a whole lot cheaper than starting a war ... We have the ability to take him out, and I think the time has come that we exercise that ability. We don't need another $200 billion war to get rid of one, you know, strong-arm dictator. It's a whole lot easier to have some of the covert operatives do the job and then get it over with." –Pat Robertson, calling for the assassination of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez
"Maybe we need a very small nuke thrown off on Foggy Bottom to shake things up" –Pat Robertson, on nuking the State Department
2007-06-23 04:08:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by Black Dragon 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
i don't think of he will substitute plenty, a President isn't a king in spite of each little thing, there is the Congress and the ideally suited courtroom that has a say in affairs too. one element that i don't think of his supporters or probable even Obama himself comprehend is that in the event that they win the oval workplace, that they had greater advantageous strap in for one hell of a curler coaster journey. activities have a fashion of overshadowing agendas. I see the subsequent President being greater reactive than proactive, quite a Democrat. Senator McCain knows the terrain greater advantageous and has a particularly greater advantageous take care of on issues and concepts yet I doubt if Obama is as much as the activity. one element is for specific, Al Qaeda, China, Russia, North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela and Iran will declare a countrywide trip if Obama wins.
2016-12-08 17:07:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by selders 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Pat Robertson would execute anyone who didn't share narrow minded idiotic views
2007-06-22 20:46:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by The Prez. 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
He wouldn't execute liberals, but he would undermine the values on which this U.S. government was founded
1) Natural Rights
2) Separation of church & state
3) limited government
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
"In every country and in every age, the priest has been hostile to liberty. He is always in alliance with the despot, abetting his abuses in return for protection to his own."
-Thomas Jefferson, letter to Horatio G. Spafford, March 17, 1814
2007-06-22 20:51:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by energeticthinker 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
I don't think he would execute anyone but I do think he would re-write the Constitution and that many christian conservatives and their representatives would be okay with that.
2007-06-22 21:53:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by BOOM 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Of course he would!! Pat Robertson has a long history of being a kook!
2007-06-22 20:31:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
Hitler had mobolized his own German population into a massive killing machine against the undesirables. Indifference is the most dangerous attitude an individual can have.
2007-06-22 20:28:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by ibid 3
·
7⤊
0⤋
Pat Robertson, if elected, would give great hope to the Geico cavemen!
lol
2007-06-22 20:39:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
Careful, that's a double-edged sword. We know if the reverse happens that you will certainly not be spared.
travolta_stinks; do you really notice a difference between Neocons, Nazis, and the KKK?
2007-06-22 20:36:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by Dull Jon 6
·
3⤊
0⤋