This didn't start with the Shrub. Started long ago before him. It won't be easy and will take a long time. But if they take it a couple steps at a time in 8 years this country can get back to what its supposed to be like. First end all foreign entanglements and close all our bases. Then use the troops to protect the border.
They will be met with opposition from all the special interest groups along the way. But Paul/ Gravel never let that bother them before so they won't now.
2007-06-22 23:21:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
he's making an attempt, yet Republicans in the abode won't permit him. Obama needs to restoration the financial gadget, yet Republicans do not choose Obama to get that credit. that's why they have been pushing for the two financial gadget-stifling austerity measures or an financial gadget-destroying default on our public debt. The conflict in Iraq is over, and the conflict in Afghanistan would be executed quickly. perhaps shall we've pulled out of Afghanistan by potential of now if Bush hadn't skipped over Afghanistan for thus long, obsessing over Iraq fairly. i don't see how the form is being destroyed by potential of Obama. I by no potential believed 2d substitute protections have been absolute. i'm plenty greater worried with regard to the unconstitutional way Republicans are enjoying speedy and unfastened with the credibility persons debt, threatening default only to fabricate leverage in financial debates. That smells somewhat too very comparable to hostage-taking and terrorism for my convenience.
2016-11-07 06:33:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is a mess thats for sure, we truly have a bloated system and we need to clean house. Maybe Paul and Gravel could get us started, they are both kinda cut from the same cloth.
2007-06-22 19:21:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Paul/Gravel have interesting ideas about America and our foundation, but for it to work without putting thousands of people out of jobs, we as a country would need to gradually backpedal through decades and decades of economic agendas and an expanding government that has put us in our current state. To just pull the plug now wouldn't work.
Also, to be honest, Gravel is a little too crazy for me. The guy hasn't held office in a looooong time.
2007-06-22 17:30:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by getonthebus25 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
I say Dr. Ron Paul for president 2008! I don't know that much about Gravel but hearing the globalists whine about him is enough for me to seriously consider him!
2007-06-22 17:39:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
Ron Paul would get my vote, if for no other reason than he has the objectivity to question whether or not America was involved in 9-11. There is credible evidence to support such a theory, and - considering how our government has lied to us over these past fifty years - it wouldn't surprise me at all! Anyone who blindly believes what our government tells them is gullible enough to deserve the lying, cheating government they get. -RKO- 06/22/07
2007-06-22 17:32:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by -RKO- 7
·
5⤊
0⤋
I think you're absolutely right!
I have a copy of "The Ron Paul Money Book", which I wish all Americans would read, in the book he has positive answers for ALL economic questions.
Hint, I'm saving real money it's called GOLD!
I predict if Ron Paul is elected he will make us once more PROUD to be an American!
*********************************************************
2007-06-22 18:32:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by beesting 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
"what say you"? please stop sounding like bill o'reilly. But yes, Ron Paul/Anybody like him would be okay with me.
2007-06-22 17:33:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
Ron Paul is an idiot. Anyone that wants to blame America for 9/11 will never get my vote. I'd rather see Billery win.
2007-06-22 17:28:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by netjr 6
·
0⤊
10⤋
Let's get it done.
2007-06-22 17:54:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋