I want detailed answers here. Why? Why not? Where would he hide her body? Why wasn't his son harmed or kidnapped? Details people, details.
2007-06-22 16:49:47 · 9 answers · asked by Tom's View 2 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
Yes, I believe he killed her and dumped her body somewhere. I believe he left the 2-year old unharmed to make it look like he didn't pick up the kid as he was scheduled to at 10:PM last week as was planned, so he left the kid there in hopes that it would throw the police off of his trail.
I believe he knew someone would go to the house and find the kid there unharmed because he probably left chips or something out for the kid to eat and water or milk too. He knew that Jessie was close to her mom and family, so it would be just a matter of close timing before they'd make their way over to her house.
Has Bobby Cutts even lifted a finger to help out in the search? NO, he has not. Why didn't Bobby Cutts go to work as was his usual work schedule last Wednesday or Thursday at 12:Midnight (June 13 - 14th)? He has somewhat of an alibi, but not one that is completely accountable for all of his time on these two days. We know that Jessie's mom spoke with her at 9:30PM on that Wednesday night before she disappeared, so this puts Bobby as the last one who would have logically had contact with her.
He's a slimy cop and should have never been a cop in the first place with the record of abuse and criminal activity he's had. Do I think he killed Jessie and her unborn baby? YES. Until I learn anything further my strong conclusion is that he did.
Why do these men keep doing these things? They're not getting away with their heinous crimes. Why does America have the worst murder rate per capita in the world? There is not enough detterence to cause us Americans to stop and think first of the rammifications and consequences. There is just no letting up on Bobby Cutts at this point because everything points to him! Why isn't he helping all these hundreds, even over 1,000 strangers who have volunteered to help look for Jessie. Why isn't Bobby Cutts helping them find her?
Suspicious to you?
EDIT: SPECIAL REPORT!
Well, we can stop wondering now. Bobby Cutts has been arrested for Jessie Davis' murder and the murder of her unborn baby earlier today. They found her body and unborn child today at 3:30PM in Summit County, Ohio. He is in jail now and will be arraigned on Monday, June 25.
2007-06-23 06:41:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
We don't need another "Scott" Peterson case her to cost us more than the average trial, but statistics prove that the husband, boy-friend, whatever is the first to be interrogated. Having said that, they have had no other leads in over a week, still have people out looking, so no other suspects have come to the fore front, the timing is right for Bobby Cutts (he was off on the day after until the Friday of the alleged disappearance), a relationship that may not have been that stable (the Mom cannot comment on it), so all signs do point to him...I suspect he must prove himself innocent, instead of the cops proving him guilty...he also, if premediated, would have the tools to put everything at bay for a long time, if for ever. Like, OJ, where are the killer(s)...
2007-06-23 01:31:03 · answer #2 · answered by basport_2000 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
If he did not i come across it an exceedingly unusual reaction for a Police Officer. His tale is she have been given ill, surpassed out and died. Why does not he purely call the paramedics? She's pregnant ! He must be hiding some thing. no you may respond to that concern like that except they had some thing to cover or brought about the harm. If it even occurred like that for the time of any respect which I doubt . It purely does not make experience. If somebody gets ill and dies you do not call yet another woman and cover the physique. And depart a 2 12 months previous infant to fend for itself without food or water for 2 days except you probably did some thing incorrect. He could be put in penitentiary basically for traumatizing that little boy and leaving him on my own after observing his mom die. what type of ill as*hollow does that? The police at the instant are not liberating any evidence to the Media because of fact they don't choose to jeopardize the case.
2016-11-07 06:30:11 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's mere speculation , but if circumstancial evidence is any indication..he did it . I have a feeling he told the baby "mommy broke the table" . He was said to have been violent on occasion and was fired from another police force for behavorial issues ..Someone with that background ( and the mindset to harm another person - especially a pregnant one ) would be capable of "planting" a scenario in the mind of a toddler . Knowing how toddlers repeat ..or mimic a mom or dad..I can see a baby repeating a phrase like "mommy broke the table". A baby that age is not going to reason something like that out on his own . He was fed that information . I also have a hunch that he was told his mommy fell in the rug..but he may have forgotten to say all the words .
I think it was a crime of passion and not planned . If it was planned , he wouldn't have taken a chance on a "witness". Originally , the dad had plans for a visit with his son , which shows an interest & love for his child - so he didn't want to hurt him . I think it's just a matter of time before people realize that a toddler isn't going to have those sorts of explanations on his own..that he was fed that line about the table ..in hopes of repeating it . The first thing a parent teaches a child to do , is to communicate .." Mommy" , " Daddy". "Bye-bye". What does the baby do ? It repeats the words ..Pretty soon you are teaching him sentences...P.S. Dad knew the baby isn't going to say "daddy said mommy broke the table"..again..he knows the child is going to mimic what he heard . And I'll bet he heard those remarks several times until he could repeat it with a fair amount of ease .
2007-06-23 02:22:49 · answer #4 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I think Cutts probably did it, he hid her body to conceal evidence. He didn't harm his son, because he has a bond with his son and loves him. He loved Jesse, too, but could not fathom having another child and greed got to him. Child support. The love of money is the root of evil.
2007-06-22 18:44:01 · answer #5 · answered by winkcat 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
what is the answer? he kille dthe mother of his unborn child and his unborn child....................why???? I can't answer that maybe a demon buried deep in his soul showed no mercy, I'll never understand why. I watche d court t.v. waiting for the answer but do we truly know? My prayers go out to the family. heaven has a special angel and now an innocent soul to answer those questions for only God and that young mother know the answer. rest in peace and know that you are in God's hands.
2007-06-23 11:26:48 · answer #6 · answered by amother 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
http://www.wkyc.com/news/regional/akron_article.aspx?storyid=69955
not many to find that aren't repetitious..here is a report on the recent 2nd FBI search. video links on the page show the most recent news reports
2007-06-22 17:14:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Are you with the FBI? 2 words ( OJ SIMPSON )
2007-06-22 16:57:23 · answer #8 · answered by IOWA HAWKEYES 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
hope they catch whoever did it i don't get into blaming games b/c it is far too many that goes to jail innocent my heart goes out to both families
2007-06-23 09:38:02 · answer #9 · answered by mishoney 4 · 1⤊ 4⤋