Have you seen this, a profound discovery spiked by Western Media?

Question

Here is an India news broadcast of the emergence of a colossal anthropomorphic skeleton upon the western shores of India. The skeleton was dredged up from the depths of the Indian Ocean sea floor by the catastrophic December 28, 2004 Indonesian Tsunami, and it finally surfaced and beached upon land over a year later in 2006. The skeleton of the creature is about 300 feet in height, half buried in the sand. Note the bone structure of the rib cage, and the five digit fingers on the titanic hand. Its skull is intact, and in the closing scene of the report, the eye socket can be seen in the side of the skull behind the news reporter.

Though the discovery is over a year old, to date the main stream media of the West and the U.S. have not yet reported on this profound and startling scientific discovery, obviously because of its anthropomorphic structure, which does not conveniently fit into the current scientific paradigm nor does it "support" the bogus Evolution/Uniformitarian Model, but, on the contrary, is in diametric opposition to it, for the Holy Scriptures state that before the Flood of Noah, "There were giants in the world in those days."

YouTube link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Mra5s_zOQ4

Rohak 1212... I don't dismiss science at all; in fact, I never said this. I'm for Scientific Reformation. I never insisted that there were 6 literal days of Creation; in fact, I did not even mention the Creation. These are your assumptions that you have projected upon me based on your stereotypical image of those against Evolution. Not all of us opposed to Evolution are 6-Day Creation Literalists. I believe that instead of evolution there was a polybiological explosion of life with all its contemporanous variety, all in unison, "Spontaneous Polybiological Mass Profusionism" (SPMP) as described in the "Egyptian Book of the Dead" and in the writings of "Hermes Thrice Great", hardly Christian documents. It is my conclusion that Evolution is severe misinterpretation of the data. You would come to the same conclusion if you did your own original research in the field and do not rely on accepted notions spoon fed to the masses. Don't accept conventionalism; find the facts yourself.

Answer 1

The video does not show nearly enough of the skeleton to make any determination, but more than likely it is just a blue whale skeleton that has been doctored up to look like something else.

Answer 2

What a crazy spoof. A "giant" 50 times as tall as a regular human weighs OVER A HUNDRED THOUSAND TIMES as much as a regular human, but his bones are only about TWO THOUSAND times as strong, therefore he will collapse under his own weight. He needs 100,000 times as much oxygen, but his windpipe is only 2000 times wider. And so on, and so on. Therefore the skeleton is a spoof.

Read D'Arcy Wentworth Thomson, "On Growth and Form", and J.B.S. Haldane, "On being the right size", for a lucid explanation of how scale factors affect the shape of living things. This is in accordance with the Creator's immutable laws, which both these authors devoutly believed in.

Why would anybody want to believe in an eternal Creator who has put us in a world whose eternal, consistent and predictable behaviour we can understand, by using our Creator-given intelligence, then pulls a fast one on us with some total inconsistency like this from the past?

Answer 3

That clip is obviously fake. This "recently exposed" find is sticking out of the sand 4 feet! Your faith in the scriptures is commendable, but don't dismiss science out of hand either. You obviously have issues with the idea of Evolution. But let me offer a suggestion: Evolution and Creation are not mutually exclusive ideas. Sure, the bible says the earth was created in six days. But why do you insist that it literally means six days? God is timeless, and to him 60 billion years is the same as 6 days. So maybe he used Evolution as his tool for Creation.

Whether or not you like my idea, in the future try to find better "evidence" to support your beliefs.

Answer 4

Noah didn't happen and yes, we know their where giant animals in prehistoric times. Heard of dinosaurs? This is merely another fossil found that in no way is in "diametic opposition" to evolution. It hasn't even been studied yet and we have no idea how old it is. It could just be a whale skelton.

Religious fantanics are crazy not to think evolution happened and obviously desperate to latch on to something like this to try to "disprove" evolution.

We have millions of fossils that DO support evolution without a doubt and no serious Western media outlets are going to waste time on BS found on youtube.

Answer 5

Sorry mate that's a digitised hoax.