only so long as they swear on the bible that they don't believe in god and promise never to attend church
2007-06-22 15:34:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
5⤋
That is not a proper question for this forum.
IVF treatments are between the patient and the doctor. Your implication is that gays are somehow a class to be treated differently and you are most assuredly wrong.
2007-06-22 15:35:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by .*. 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
"being they are no longer able to have a toddler of course could they be allowed to have one with the aid of synthetic help?" ANY time a pair turns to IVF is by using the fact they are no longer able to have a toddler of course... "Do you think of a toddler anyplace achievable could be waiting to develop up with a mom and a father?" no longer inevitably. study teach that little ones do only right in a house the place they are enjoyed, supported, cared for, etc, inspite of no count if it relatively is from one parent, 2 dad and mom, greater effective than 2 dad and mom, same-intercourse dad and mom, or opposite-intercourse dad and mom. It only does not count. only through fact a toddler has a mom and a father does no longer mean they are inevitably getting the care and love they desire. I rather help the final of a same-intercourse couple to undertake a toddler, or have a toddler with the aid of IVF or surrogacy. back, study teach that little ones of same-intercourse couples are only as happy, properly-adjusted, and useful as toddlers of opposite-intercourse couples...there is likewise a achievable further bonus -- same-intercourse couples tend to be plenty greater possibly to teach their toddlers approximately selection and tolerance for others than are opposite-intercourse couples. Any functional individual could have the final to have a toddler. Sexual orientation does no longer impression competency in this regard.
2016-10-02 23:54:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You make it sound like a university exam essay.
2007-06-22 15:38:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Everyone should be allowed to do everything that everyone else can do. Unless it is bad--then NOBODY should be allowed to do it.
2007-06-22 15:33:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by Busta 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
yes its descrimination to not allow them..
2007-06-22 21:06:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sam B 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
sure they should they are people
2007-06-26 01:00:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by cheri h 7
·
0⤊
0⤋