Why Aren't Liberals Tolerant of Sacred Institutions Like Marriage and Try To Force Gayness Into It?

Answer 1

Good question.I think like everything else they do it is just meant to undermine morality and thus dumb people down so that people are too stupid and too preoccupied to pay any attention to how their freedom is being taken away from them by the one party system and it's liberal agenda.

Did I say one party system? I meant two-party system.
jajajaja (wink)

~

Answer 2

You certainly do see things with black colored glasses on. You don't see life as it really is. You are the one who is not tolerant. You are the one who is for some reason seeing marriage as a sacred institution. I see marriage as a joining of two people, and it doesn't matter who the two people are. There is no sacred matter to it. Not everyone is married by a religious person, a lot of marriages are civil marriages, thus, not as you put it sacred, and so, if two gay people want to marry, they are not breaking any sacred institutions. They are merely living their lives, and it's none of your f--king business. So, but your nose out of their business and go deal with your own problems.

Answer 3

Marriage is not a "sacred institution." It is a legally binding contract between two consenting adults. If your religion does not permit gay marriage then your preacher or reverend should not have to marry gays. But, their is no reason two men or two women can't be married in the legal since.
If you think that gay marriage is an abomination, then don't let them marry in your church. But, if they want to get married in the courthouse by the Justice of the Peace, then that is their decision and it does not effect you.

Answer 4

Marriage is a cultural rite and religious sacrament not an institution, quit spreading misinformation

Answer 5

Who are the liberals? For the purposes of this discussion they are people who favor gay marriage. If you define liberals as people who favor gay marriage, then, guess what, 100% of all these liberals favor gay marriage. On the other hand, if you define liberals as people who eat granola for breakfast, then you will find that only some of them favor gay marriage. A better question might be, "What is the rationale for favoring gay marriage?" and just leave the liberal thing out of it.

Answer 6

If you would like marriage to be subject to the laws of your religion, then by all means, keep it out of civil law and we'll grant civil unions for everyone who wishes to form a union for legal purposes. You can't have your cake and eat it too. As much as it pains you, there ARE other people in this country with their own beliefs and rights who are as much of a human being as you are.

Answer 7

i think of the time will come while the be conscious all of us be responsive to now as "Marriage" will grow to be a pair of diverse words with somewhat diverse meanings. In Europe, marriage continues to be style of a church element, and various couples don't get married through fact they are non-believers. interior the U. S., many marriage ceremonies are completed in a properly mannered way, without rabbi or priest. Then there are "undemanding regulation" unions. and a few states enable for "civil unions" for gays. Are we to call any of those marriages without distinguishing their diffused modifications? One course i'd foresee is that modern-day human beings would abandon the "marriage" label altogether, in team spirit with gays and different non-classic couples, or in attractiveness of its archaic, non-suitable roots. while spousal rights are acknowledged between any 2 people who call for and settle for them, a sparkling term will evolve, one meaning comparable to "married." "Marriage" would (back) grow to be something that basically happens in a church. the hot term, ("espousal," or "unition") will recommend only approximately an analogous element. "SigOth" stands for significant different. "existence significant different" is used with the aid of the two gay and directly couples. "Mate" is nearly common. yet diversification is inevitable.

Answer 8

Liberalism, the mantra of tolerance, and vise verse, right? Liberals are tolerant of anything that they perceive conservatives not to be. in general Liberals are tolerant of very little, don't believe me? How many unjustified violation notices have you received lately?

Answer 9

If 50% of marriages end in divorce ...how is marriage 'sacred'?

Who cares if you don't like gays?!

You have no reason to marry someone who is gay!

Answer 10

They are, all they want is for every person to have the same rights as any other person: to marry the one that they love.

A counter question: Do you realize that you being intolerant of liberals' opinions is anti-American? Since the American way is that every citizen is entitled to their own opinion.

Answer 11

I'm a liberal and i have been married for 50 years. Can Newt Gingrich say this or John McCain and most every Conservative that is running for president? Get your facts straight before you start ac using people.