should the U.S. adopt the Libertarian Foreign policy...?

Question

and pull out of Europe and let Russia,China and the muslims fight over it?

Libertarian Foreign Policy

American foreign policy should seek an America at peace with the world and the defense -- against attack from abroad -- of the lives, liberty, and property of the American people on American soil. Provision of such defense must respect the individual rights of people everywhere.

The principle of non-intervention should guide relationships between governments. The United States government should return to the historic libertarian tradition of avoiding entangling alliances, abstaining totally from foreign quarrels and imperialist adventures, and recognizing the right to unrestricted trade, travel, and immigration.

Answer 1

Yes and what most people don't get due to mainstream media distorting the facts is that libertarians do stand for defense. If someone attacks us, we won't just do nothing. We defend.

We also don't go on a kill parade away from the original target and stir up more conflict using one agenda to spread into more agendas.

We don't even belong in Iraq and for everyone who takes swipes at libertarians calling them isolationist yet they subscribe to the get them before they get us theory....don't you think being paranoid about what everyone else is doing meanwhile our defenses here in America are down is pretty screwed up??

Answer 2

The Monroe doctrine would drive the libertarians to distraction and drink.

The Monroe Doctrine is a U.S. doctrine which, on December 2, 1823, proclaimed that European powers would no longer colonize or interfere with the affairs of the nations of the Americas. The United States planned to stay neutral in wars between European powers and its colonies. However, if these latter types of wars were to occur in the Americas, the United States would view such action as hostile. President James Monroe first stated the doctrine during his seventh annual State of the Union Address to Congress, a defining moment in the foreign policy of the United States.

From that description of the Monroe doctrine (thank you, wikipedia) it is easy to see that even as early as 1823 the United States recognized the necessity of securing the continents of North and South America from foreign intervention. The current libertarian view differs sharply from that doctrine; it would have the United States blind themselves to anything occurring beyond their immediate borders.

It is much better to fight a war on someone else's ground than in your own cities, towns and streets. So, as you can see, liberarian ideals have their limits, and those limits are set at the immediate borders of the United States. Foreign policy is not their bailywick.

Answer 3

It sounds perfect. Yet, there are times we have to intervene to prevent greater quarrels. The problem there is when do we know when to intervene and when to stay out? Neutrality is a double-edged sword which is why the major powers have never used too faithfully. I do agree that nation building and the neo-conservative philosophy is wrong. We need to reevaluate our view on foreign policy.

Answer 4

It sounds so good, in theory. I don't think it is possible in practice, however. We already have entangling alliances, we are in the midst of a foreign quarrel, and we have numerous imperialistic adventures underway. I think it is too late to go back, if we were ever there.

Answer 5

Libertarianism advocates the minimization of the state and the maximization of guy or woman liberty and freedom. in spite of if, there modifications among libertarians, as an occasion, there are some who help inner maximum possession and others who recommend collective possession of the possibility of production. people who help inner maximum possession tend to assist the capitalist economic device, those libertarians are possibly to assist unrestricted immigration for the justifications your question factors to. In usa loose-marketplace capitalist libertarians are the main undemanding, and there are various companies which sell the abolishment of various the welfare state - as an occasion capitalist libertarians are trendy interior the Tea social gathering. yet there are are patently tensions between classic conservatives (to boot as different ultimate wing ideologies which make up the tea social gathering) and capitalist libertarians, through fact the the former usually helps greater effective regulations on immigration on an analogous time as the latter does no longer. on an analogous time as capitalist libertarians help a alleviation of the state through fact they think it as coercive to guy or woman liberty, libertarians who help collective possession flow greater and notice the the social kin of capitalism as additionally coercive to guy or woman liberty. yet those libertarians (usually defined as libertarian socialists) are additionally possibly to assist unrestricted immigration yet for various motives. quite than aiming to maximise the means of the loose marketplace, libertarian socialists see immigration as a controversy of guy or woman rights and liberty - i.e. we could consistently all have the final to stay and artwork the place we'd desire to. In precis the the respond on your question would be confident, maximum libertarians help unrestricted immigration. yet no longer all libertarians agree that the reason being for it relatively is to assist the capitalist economic device. desire this helps.

Answer 6

Today they were talking about the need to elect a EU president.

It won't be long until Germany asks us to go home.

I can imagine the Deutche Bank saying Ve von de Var now go home.

Answer 7

If it is the job of the United States to defend Europe, who is Europe responsible for defending?

Answer 8

Absolutely. Ron Paul restored faith in government for me.

Answer 9

Wow, great idea maybe too late
Weapons lobby wouldn't like either

Answer 10

It seems to work for Switzerland.