Self preservation is definitely a top priority for politicians on both sides. And that's bad for all of us. What's worse is the way the two parties attack each other. This is a tool they use to get their constituents (ie., the general public) to attack each other and that leaves no one to solve any real issues.
What's funny is that many people don't even know they're being used this way.
2007-06-22 11:37:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Get Smart™ 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
My predicament is that usa has permit a pair of replace rules for the various. Any u . s ., team, place of residing, enterprise, business company etc. Has to have floor innovations. rather of status up for our founding fathers floor innovations, we've dismantled the very shape that united maximum individuals. We had distinctive innovations approximately issues past to, yet our undemanding essence grow to be an analogous. Now we are splitting. I observed with the unpredicted votes for Huckabee that conservativeness isn't ineffective, nonetheless. there are multiple us alive and properly. i think of we do only no longer holler as loud - partially through fact the media is administered with the aid of making use of the left wing (ABC, CBS and particularly NBC.) and does no longer desire youthful individuals to be conservative. did you be responsive to that deliberate parenthood is a multimillion greenback company? they do no longer desire to sell abstinence past to marriage! ingesting and partying is expexted of the instructions little ones! it relatively is why you spot maximum of viagra and girls long long previous wild classified ads on at situations while the entire significant different and little ones is gazing television. Make the left wing point of view classic. in spite of if it rather's now no longer.
2016-10-02 23:37:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by minick 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Political parties are based on different economic theories, which are rooted in ancient times, and they have developed in the last 250 years.
Fresh new ideas should be welcomed as soon as they are FULLY based on an applyable economic theory. That's not easy AT ALL, neither to be composed, nor to be massively welcomed.
Olcaykar: Yes, indeed. But I say they're BASED on economic theories. (the fathers of which, are : A. Smith, J. Kaynes, K. Marx)
2007-06-22 11:38:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Katerina P 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yes, they get bogged down in mud slinging, which gets in their ears and prevents new and fresh thoughts to penetrate.
My opinion is let Ron Paul start a Constitutionalist party if he gets elected President, and allow the socialists to start an anti-constitutional party, they ignore the Constitution anyway.
2007-06-22 11:47:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by beesting 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yes, and to get to that level they have to sound off the party line.
2007-06-22 11:23:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't know if it's parties as much as the process. Democracy is sloooow - especially when clogged up with irrational outside influences.....
2007-06-22 11:30:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
It seems only the Republican "stay the course" party is opposed to new ideas.
2007-06-22 11:25:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
The democratic party is the enemy of ideas yes.
2007-06-22 11:25:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
you know that theory and practice go different own way...
2007-06-22 17:25:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Oh yes.
2007-06-22 11:28:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by gone 7
·
1⤊
1⤋