At a microscopic level, of course, it is a random process just like everything else is. At the macroscopic level, though, you can treat the draining of the capacitor (or a lump of radioactive stuff decaying) as determined by set laws of physics.
The similarity of the draining capacitor to radioactive decay you notice is because the charge on the capacitor and the amount of undecayed material in a radioactive source obey the same differential equation, so their solutions have the same form. I wouldn't read too much physical significance into it.
Good question though. Don't let some jerk tell you otherwise.
2007-06-22 11:24:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Capacitor decay and radioactive decay are two quite different processes which happen to obey the same equation. However, radioactive decay is a random process, at the atomic level, and capacitor decay is not.
Just because the description of two things is similar (eg same equation) doesn't mean the mechanism is the same.
2007-06-22 19:11:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by Martin 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
the first person who answered this question is a ****, as of course radioactive decay is a random process. i think u could well argue that all decays are a random process as there is not property that would favour one molecule for example to "decay" before another
2007-06-22 12:06:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Capacitive decay is not random in the sense that it can be plotted and it follows an exponential curve.
The actual orientation of the curve is determined by whether you are measuring the charge decay in coulombs, voltage decay in volts or current decay in amps.
What's wrong with going to Wiki?
2007-06-23 14:11:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by Rob K 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
OK RC series circuit. i=V/R ohms law (i=i(t))
C=Q/V defn of capacitance
i= Q' defn of current (decreasing - sign)
>Q'=-Q/RC or solving,Q= Qoexp(-t/RC) (Qo=initial charge) Integral of 1/Q= LnQ so LnQ=-t/RC +const etc
For random radioative decay obv decay rate depends on population of undecayed atoms
N'=-kN Solving N=Noexp(-kt) (No= initial atom pop) and int 1/N =LnN as b4
It's just it's the same mathematical model for both processes..
2007-06-22 11:50:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by RTF 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Show me your evidence for random discharge.
Its very predictable - get a voltmeter and a cap and record it accurately. a few 10,000uF at say 20V to start with. check every 10 secs. Plot it. Try with various large bleed resistors.
2007-06-22 11:26:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It decays exponentially, and it very predictable:
(The link is to an experiment that will demonstrate this)
2007-06-22 11:32:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by Randy G 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Radioactive decay is not random either.
Learn what you are taught and don't question it till you know what you're talking about.
2007-06-22 11:22:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋