Wow isnt it strange that this petty trickle of soldiers head over, then all of a sudden (despite the fact that they were spread everywhere) that all over the news, so many terrorists are being killed, not a chance, all thats being done is to put up a front so Mr.Bush can warrent having his troops there. Remember only 35% of Iraq is stable...thats a hell of a lot of terrorists, that nobody knows who they look like, all of a sudden the trickle is making a difference, the troops should have gone to Afg to look for the main terrorists. MMM flys a couple planes into building (conspiracy), and troops head to Iraq? Remember once again, its been proven by the Nuke guys that there was nothing there. Now this is where you should all learn something, recent comments from Colin Powell, he admits that there was nothing there, false information, trucks supposed to be mobile labs, no chemical residue at all. "whe were wrong". MMMM...republicans, get our people out of there, theres no need.
Pinkwrl
2007-06-22 11:16:45 · 10 answers · asked by Leonard K 1 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Yes, but the biased liberal media chooses not to report on it.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,286154,00.html
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,284873,00.html?sPage=fnc.world/iraq
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,283515,00.html?sPage=fnc.world/iraq
2007-06-22 11:22:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonnnn24424 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
of direction--as Bush himself by accident revealed. >the surge grew to become into billled as a pruely non everlasting boost in troop ranges from the initiating--from 130K to 160K entire. After some months, it grew to become into to be ended and troop ranges returned to their pre-surge numbers >now, Bush is calling the removing of the further troops a "shrink" and pretending he's beginning off to withdraw troops type iraq. In different words, jsut extra neocon spin and lies. Bush has no objective of cutting the fairly troop ranges--and suggested so, once you get all the way down to the information of what he actually suggested.
2016-10-18 09:59:24 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The surge failed months ago after it started.
And with most of Al-Qaeda of Iraq's leadership having escaped--and the bulk of its fighters with it--you can bet that this doesn't bode well for Bush at a latter date.
What I find is funny, is that we sent in 10,000 US and Iraqi "troops" to clear out the fringes of Baghdad and the capital, and we only come away with 22 dead enemy combatants, while losing 15 of our own in the process.
Wow!
Such progress!
NOT!
2007-06-22 12:43:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
At least our soldiers know whats right and standing up for the Iraqi people is the right thing to bad people like you can be over there seeing innocent people die imagine your toddlers being decapitated.........people like you make me sick...
2007-06-22 16:13:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think we should surge the Iraqis with kindness, not soldiers.
2007-06-22 11:19:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Everything you have stated is true and we need to purge "The Surge.
2007-06-22 14:29:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the guy posts news from FOX news, holy **** you are retarded, these guys lie more than the bush administration.
2007-06-22 11:56:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
i think there doing fine but i dont know if its nessassry or not
2007-06-26 07:59:54 · answer #8 · answered by donielle 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
of course it is working, for the insurgents.
2007-06-22 15:28:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i dont feel like reading. i didnt read..bye.
2007-06-26 08:01:23 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋