English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-06-22 10:22:47 · 14 answers · asked by tom the plumber 3 in Politics & Government Elections

14 answers

Plumber,
neo-libs never take responsibility.

After the initial demise, the many re-counts and firing of their advisers for not getting the correct message out, NLs will blame the foolish population for not recognizing the true wonders of the party.

Have you wondered why (if Mrs Clinton is such a shoe in to win both the nomination and the general election) she has not resigned her senate seat to run full time?

2007-06-22 12:53:01 · answer #1 · answered by GIVRO 3 · 3 1

The Rush factor will be huge in 2008, but it will work for the Democrats. When Senator Clinton is nominated Mr. Limbaugh will go ape excrement crazy, and the venom he has spewed about her for the last sixteen years will come out as concentrated acid.

This can only help the Democrats, since the general public are tired of that fat drug addicted pedant vilifying everything in sight. While the neoMcCarthyite Republicans will love him and the liberal Democrats will hate him as per usual, the moderates who decide every election have turned against the politics of slander. We seek someone, anyone, on either side who does not spew hate at their opponents simply for disagreement's sake.

We also want to completely repudiate partisan politics as a blood sport, and return to reasoned debate and compromise. Mostly though, we want to annoy Rush Limbaugh, Anne Coulter and the idoits at FOX. This looks good for Senator Clinton.

Who do they hate the most?

2007-06-22 19:51:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Why don't we as human beings stop the bickering and finger pointing blame game and start taking action against the Tyranny occuring in this Nation.

Washington as a whole will be responsible for it - for ignoring the cries of the voters who elected them to do the job that We the People have instructed by electing them!

When your Government stops hearing the voice of its voters there is something seriously wrong as a whole!

When America and her people come second to Foreign policy - there is definitly something wrong!

A serious overhaul is needed at all levels on both sides of this one party system. We have no choice but to flush Washington as a whole and elect real American's for the sake of America

It is not crazy to love your Country!

We can start by electing Ron Paul!

At least our Constitutional rights will be protected, and to me that is very important and a start in the right direction!

2007-06-22 18:56:44 · answer #3 · answered by scottanthonydavis 4 · 0 0

Taking his drug habits into consideration, Rush Limbaugh will soon be to blame for the demise of Rush Limbaugh.

2007-06-23 01:51:27 · answer #4 · answered by Liberals love America! 6 · 1 2

If the libs lose in 08, then yes, they'll pin the blame on Rush Limbaugh, or that conservatives were too stupid to understand them, or the vast right-wing conspiracy that stole the election.

They'll blame anything except their own failed policies and failed governance.

2007-06-22 18:45:44 · answer #5 · answered by Uncle Pennybags 7 · 1 1

Considering the size of his audience, Rush Limbaugh will be a factor in every election for some time.

2007-06-22 17:43:27 · answer #6 · answered by mcranley 1 · 4 2

No, they are capable of blowing it all by themselves. Rush will be more like a play-by-play announcer for the fall.

2007-06-22 19:48:42 · answer #7 · answered by Bawney 6 · 1 1

Last time it was Karl Rove...they are going to have to find a new scapegoat for their own errors this time around (or maybe they will just turn to old reliable once again).

2007-06-22 20:27:52 · answer #8 · answered by Calvin 7 · 0 1

If liberals loose they will blame anyone and everyone but themselves, Its the liberal standard!

2007-06-22 18:26:51 · answer #9 · answered by johnywinslow 3 · 2 2

Just the opposite. People know how ridiculous he is and therefore, because he has been a proven liar, they will vote opposite of him. He is not pro liberal.

2007-06-22 18:26:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers