why should they be allowed to live? why should they be allowed to kill all of us? wouldnt they just convince anyone whos left to kill eachother off till theyre all thats left? would they fight? & for what at that point? why do we follow these freaks so blindly?
2007-06-22 09:56:00 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
ljunglekat75, leave it? & be subject to us foreign policy? no! im trying to change it from the inside, as patriots do. you sound duped, reciting cliches.
2007-06-22 12:09:27 · update #1
Pretsler, i'll sacrifice you for the common good.
2007-06-22 23:35:16 · update #2
It is not only wrong that they will be safe during a war they start, it is also wrong to start a nuclear war, period. The only way to prevent this country from starting a nuclear war is to elect a president who will never attack another country preemptively, no matter what the excuse. Congress, which has the exclusive constitutional power to declare war, has passed the buck to the president for the past seventy years, and presidents have taken full advantage of that. It is imperative that the United States stop intervening in other countries' affairs with military force, or the threat of it.
2007-06-22 10:58:15 · answer #1 · answered by AlexW 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Name any part of war that is right, the leaders who start them are always safe, and so are their families.
If the US gov. starts the draft again you know that the politicians families will not be drafted, and most other rich folks families will be safe as well.
War is started by the rich and fought by the poor!
Leaders do not care about people or their lives, the leaders only care about money and power and the fact that their
name will live on in history. eg: Geo Bush
Watch the movie "Sicko", to see just how little the gov. cares about people, BUT They love the all mighty dollar
2007-06-22 17:04:07 · answer #2 · answered by Willy 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You make me feel so old.
Yes, in the moral clarity of child-like innocence, it's obviously wrong. Of course, no one's started a nulcear war, in large part, because every nation who might do so is targetted by so many nukes it'd never survive the retaliation that would provoke. Were it not for the willingness of every such nation to launch on eachother in retaliation, a nuclear war would have happened decades ago.
2007-06-22 17:01:02 · answer #3 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's a moot point. When the fools come out of their bunkers, they'll die anyway. They don't have the sense to realize that the need the "little people" to make sure that they eat and also their other needs will be met.
2007-06-22 20:55:23 · answer #4 · answered by DaddyDeath 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Did you know that in Biblical times (David v Goliath) it was necessary only to send one man against one man? It was thought that the stronger God would cause 'his man' to prevail in the battle...so no need to send lots of people to an unnecessary death.
2007-06-22 17:00:38 · answer #5 · answered by Brand X 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You could always leave this country if it doesn't suit you.
Immigrants will be happy to take your place.
=)
2007-06-22 17:29:40 · answer #6 · answered by junglekat75 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
If your not willing to sacrifice- please leave this country
kthxbai
2007-06-22 19:14:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋