English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Is there "Democrat" vs. "Republican" anymore???

Seems like it's more like the Ron Paul party who want the fiat money scams, invasions, genocides and official oppression to stop

vs.

the paid Council on Foreign Relations Candidates who have vowed to destroy Anerican sovereignty and the US Consitution for a UN run one world government.

I mean, am I right or is there another candidate running for President that will abolish the I.R.S. which deposits all income tax directly to the privately owned Federal Reserve which prints the money out of nothing.

Ron Paul has also stated that the 16th Amendment was never ratified, so the income tax is, in effect, illegal.

Howcome no other candidates talk about that ? Democrat or Republican ?

How about the other issues that are the will of the people? Iraq War? Real ID?

There is no Democrat vs. Republican ...

It is Ron Paul vs. Freemasons

America vs. The New World Order ?

Which side will you be on ?

RON PAUL 2008!!

2007-06-22 09:27:27 · 16 answers · asked by guiseppeamore 2 in Politics & Government Elections

mr taco,
exactly how braindead are you bud? I just mentioned in the question the income tax by passes the US treasury and goes directly to the Fed as interest on the national debt which is again charged on money printed up from nothing.
That's okay tho bud we know the gov't operatives are always the first to answer.

Lot of other good answers tho.

Maybe we can all get together and print our own paper money - can't be worth less than what we're using right now.......

2007-06-22 18:39:11 · update #1

Sally B complete braindead too.. so sad...
I gues you never heard of an Executive order. You know Executive order don't you???

Like the one Skull & Bones Bush II passed to make himself a dictator or the
W199EYE the one he signed to take the heat off his business partner bin laden??

I have to laugh at people who think they are informed cuz they can do a wikipedia search...again, so sad.......

2007-06-22 18:44:12 · update #2

16 answers

Ron Paul has never voted for a tax. Therefore he would have voted against the 16th Amendment which would have to be repealed. The IRS is widely unpopular. The only people who support it are politicians who are beholden to power and money.

2007-06-22 20:24:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Ron Paul is right. The Federal Government didn't start growing out of control until the amendment was passed to enshrine Income Confiscation into the Constitution. And yes, I consider the bloated military budget to be just another means of sending tax revenue into the coffers of businesses. People really don't realize exactly how much of their money is taxed, taxed and taxed again. You are taxed on your paycheck when you earn it, you are taxed on your purchases when you spend it, the goods you buy a portion of the price tag is taxes on the manufacturers side. Taxed, Taxed and Taxed again. We can do better, it's really sad however to see so many otherwise allegedly intelligent people who are so enamored of huge government controlling their lives that they find the concept of being free frightening.

2016-05-17 22:11:35 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0



After hearing about the Browns in NH, I did some research and according to this Tax Protesters FAQ at this site, he's right.

http://evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.html

The other candidates don't talk about a lot of things that they should.

2007-06-25 18:39:17 · answer #3 · answered by Eyes 5 · 2 0

They don't talk about it because they are all bought and paid for, and they support the fed. Yes the income tax was never properly ratified, despite what the IRS wants you to believe and the spin that people put on the truth. It is UNCONSTITUTIONAL for a citizen to be taxed unless it is apportioned which it is not. So anyone can argue anything in the world but that is the fact otherwise you can get 50000.00 for showing Aaron RUsso the law. Even IRS agents couldn't produce that law because it was never written by congress and it doesn't exist. Yes say what you want, but you will not be able to show me the written law by congress.
Either way we pay our taxes and hope things change. And ROn Paul can bring that change. Mike Gravel isn't so bad either, but I think we should all band behind RON PAUl and Gravel can be his vp!!

THANKS YOUR SMARTER THAN 80% OF AMERICANS
ROn Paul is the man!!


BTW TACO GUY- THAT WOULD BE FAIRTAX.

And to the lady that so dumbly says that we don't know what the branches of govt are, obviously RP would appoint just and good people to the judicial, Congress would know RP would veto out of control spending, and that he would be able to get the support for these bills. Congress should work for us. Not Corporate america. And RP will get the people to stand behind him and then Congress will know we are tired of their shitty bills and solutions and thus they better come up with some other things.

2007-06-22 10:20:15 · answer #4 · answered by Beauty&Brains 4 · 3 2

Ron Paul knows that both are scams.

Take Ed and Elaine Brown as an example:

They keep shouting "Show Us the Law" that we must pay our income taxes.

Has anyone showed it to them yet?

NO!

Why?

Because there is none STUPID!!

As for the Federal Reserve, it ain't nothing but a big scam also, and it doesn't even belong the the US as most believe.

It is owned by foreign elites who are getting richer by the day everytime the US has to borrow money from it and the interest rates are ungodly.

If it wasn't for it, the US wouldn't owe anyone a red cent!!

Remember what Kennedy said about it and the reason he wanted to abolish it?

That man had a head on his shoulders!!

2007-06-22 09:42:38 · answer #5 · answered by jswnwv 3 · 5 2

Ron Paul couldn't appoint to the judicial unless there were vacancies which doesn't happen very often. Congress would "get even" with Ron Paul when he vetoed all bills by not working with him on his agenda, things would grind to a halt. And he has no background within Congress for working things out to a mutually agreeable conclusion because he has so isolated himself with his "No" votes constantly. He would be totally ineffective and so would congress because they would be at such loggerheads. Frankly, I'm with Sally B: I don't think Ron Paul supporters quite "get it".

2007-06-22 10:40:00 · answer #6 · answered by BedowJ 1 · 0 1

He is not the only one. Mike Huckabee supports the Fair Tax Bill which would replace the Income Tax with a national sales tax, and eliminate the I.R.S. Congressmen, both Democrat and Republican oppose it because it would cause congress to lose power, the power the have by manipulating the tax code.

2007-06-22 09:42:38 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

I'm beginning to think Ron Paul supporters need a lesson in basic US gov't: we have three branches: Executive, Legislative, and Judicial. Now Ron Paul is running for the Executive branch. Even if he could get elected, he has no people in the legislative branch to put forth his agenda! Hence, he would have no bills to sign. With no bills to sign, none of his agenda would get implemented. Don't you guys get it? There's no reason to vote for Ron Paul! He wouldn't have ANY supporters in the legislative branch! HELLO!!! Most of the senators and representatives think he's a dufus. He will have no friends in high places. He would get nothing of his agenda actually completed! What part of this have you not thought out?

2007-06-22 10:00:17 · answer #8 · answered by Sally B 6 · 2 4

Ron Paul is a Libertarian in Republican disguise. The Libertarian party actually thinks that income tax is illegal. It's not. He's toast.

2007-06-22 10:25:56 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

Because he is the only one admit that Congress illegally ratified the 16th Amendment.

2007-06-22 09:39:18 · answer #10 · answered by Herr Raging Boehner. 5 · 6 2

fedest.com, questions and answers