bush signed the partial birth abortion ban , clinton vetoed it !?

Question

that tells you right there who the better person is !
clinton vetoed this bill and children kept dying , bush gave them life !
we are talking about 10 thousand lives a year , i think that out weighs the war dont you !

Answer 1

Yes, it shows Clinton was the better person.

Answer 2

This most definately does not out weigh war. Young mothers aborted fetus' without brains or bodys yet. I am pro-choice. People are out there getting rapped, and are in all kinds of horrible situations ending up pregnant. Woman need a choice to not go through with it if they don't have to. To not abort these babies would raise poverty level 100%. These woman are not ready for babies and should NOT be forced to have them. I agree that certain situations are different, but they all should not be punished and forced to have these children and give them horrible lives.

As for it outweighing war, I think that is the most rediculious thing I ever heard. These men and woman that are defending our COUNTRY, the country your ungrateful A** lives in. They need to get out of iraq, and start a peace treaty and THAT is more important than fetus' being aborted that have no brain or feeling! All of these woman and men are dying each day to defend us and this is what you say? This is ridiculous and I sure as hell hope your a male, because you don't know ONE D*** thing about child birth, and obviously nothing about anything else for that matter.

Clinton was a better president by 1000%, bush needs to hurry up and get out of office for causing so many deaths.

Answer 3

Laws are not what the media would have you think. If you want to have an opinion on laws, you ought to not only read the actual laws, but understand what their terminology refers to.

Partial birth abortions are very rare, few babies have ever been aborted voluntarily in this way, except where all other abortions are prohibited.

The normal use of partial birth abortion is to save the life or health of a woman who has already partially delivered a child so deformed that it will not pass through the birth canal without a potential for serious harm, or death, to the mother.

The ban on partial birth abortions may save a very few babies who's mothers find it more acceptable to carry to term in front of all their neighbors than to drive to the next state for an abortion, but it will kill some mothers, and cripple other women, potentially preventing them from ever being parents at all.

Answer 4

it relatively is greater of a non secular question, like do you help killing an harmless toddler or the mothers existence is in jeopardy so if she does not abort she would be waiting to die. Theirs no ultimate answer (or question) and no a hundred%, theirs consistently a what if, and it does happen. human beings desire take a good look into the two facets. Oh, ya Blair is a PM, no longer a president, yet good answer.

Answer 5

you're a moron. that ban is horrid. it bans the most humane procedure, that is never done on a conscious nor in many cases living fetus. because of this ban, a doctor can only do a D&E, which is dismembering the fetus in the womb and then removing it piece by piece. shows how ignorant you are on the subject.

Answer 6

Wow. You really have no idea what a partial birth abortion is do you? It is only done when the woman's life is in danger from the continued birth. Bush didn't save any lives he sent women to their deaths in childbirth!!! I truly hope you are a woman and have complications during birth. Of course, there isn't much chance of that cause if you were a woman you would know what a partial birth abortion is and would never support a ban. You are a very bad person for supporting the ban.

Answer 7

During a partial birth abortion a doctor during the last trimester induces delivery and lets the baby come out until the babies neck is showing then he stabs the baby in the base of the head up in to the brain. killing it.

I,d say Bush made the right call.

Answer 8

I support the right to choose. However I find parital birth abortion repulsive and think it should be outlawed. If you
want to abort in the first trimester thats your business but
to pull a perfectly viable person out far enough to suck its
brain out. I think the line should be drawn.

Answer 9

Jesse,

I believe that the abortion figure is a minimum of 1,000,000 lives lost per year. Remember this: if the next president is a Democrat then that ban may not be vetoed.

Answer 10

Actually, you're not talking about any lives, all it did was ban a specific technique - one that was not even medically recognized, but, rather, was defined into existance for the sole purpose of banning it. A political ploy designed to gain momentum.

Answer 11

Women have a right to choose just like you have the right to be responsible that you use condoms. What Bush signed the ban on the bill, if your talking about 43 he is to stupid to read any bill.