This is about analogies used as the means or method used by many to bolster their arguments in philosophy.
Here is some useful info about what makes an argument sound"
A02.6 Soundness
It should be obvious by now that validity is about the logical connection between the premises and the conclusion. When we are told that an argument is valid, this is not enough to tell us anything about the actual truth or falsity of the premises or the conclusion. All we know is that there is a logical connection between them, that the premises entail the conclusion.
So even if we are given a valid argument, we still need to be careful before accepting the conclusion, since a valid argument might contain a false conclusion. What we need to check further is of course whether the premises are true. If an argument is valid, and all the premises are true, then it is called a sound argument. Of course, it follows from such a definition that a sound argument must also have a true conclusion.
2007-06-22
07:34:43
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ Philosophy
In a valid argument, if the premises are true, then the conclusion cannot be false, since by definition it is impossible for a valid argument to have true premises and a false conclusion in the same situation. So given that a sound argument is valid and has true premises, its conclusion must also be true. So if you have determined that an argument is indeed sound, you can certainly accept the conclusion.
An argument that is not sound is an unsound argument. If an argument is unsound, it might be that it is invalid, or maybe it has at least one false premise, or both.
see ref entitled Argument Analysis at:
http://philosophy.hku.hk/think/arg/valid1.php
2007-06-22
07:36:02 ·
update #1
Hey Doctor Y we share a common interest in putting Sophists in their place. I consider many postmodernists as the cuttent version of the famous Greek Sophists Socrates loved to deflate.
2007-06-22
10:00:10 ·
update #2