English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

that is the basic point which A LOT OF PEOPLE are forgetting!
none of this would of happended if she was being supervised, so no matter how many excuses everyone is making, discussions, forums, blog`s, yellow ribbons, posters etc SHE WAS LEFT ALONE FFS

2007-06-22 07:18:26 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Current Events

eg she was not abducted like poor james bulger or lesley-anne downey or sarah payne she was an innocent child left alone! If an adult was with her so would she be!!!!!!!!

2007-06-22 07:35:47 · update #1

TBS HEART
its not insensitive. If i had left my child which I never have I would be so ashamed I would want to go into hiding! Not going from country to country, hello photo shoots, commenting on the 19 mins it takes me to jog up a cliff! I would be a wreck, not acting like royalty on a royal tour. They don`t seem sorry and its not a little mistake they made it`s a huge one which cost them their child. I thing they are the insensitive one`s for not RESPECTING their roles as parents!

2007-06-22 08:20:03 · update #2

TBS HEART
its not insensitive. If i had left my child which I never have I would be so ashamed I would want to go into hiding! Not going from country to country, hello photo shoots, commenting on the 19 mins it takes me to jog up a cliff! I would be a wreck, not acting like royalty on a royal tour. They don`t seem sorry and its not a little mistake they made it`s a huge one which cost them their child. I thing they are the insensitive one`s for not RESPECTING their roles as parents!

2007-06-22 08:20:04 · update #3

12 answers

I totally agree!!!! I was watching it on the news and i'm like "why the hell, did they leave those kids by themselves!!!???" Even tho they were in the hotel restaurant. It doesn't matter. Order room service. If one of them had been in that room, that lil girl wouldn't have been taken. It's a shame, and yet no one has brought up that lil fact.

2007-06-22 07:26:32 · answer #1 · answered by Candi is Dandy 4 · 2 1

I agree with you entirely. I think it all seems a little fishy to me anyway. There are lots of kids go missing, especially in America where you see their pictures on the sides of the milk cartons. This little girls disappearance, although very tragic has been so head lighted in the news and other media. I think the parents should have been held to account for child abuse for not supervising her properly while they went to the pub. Who in their right mind would leave a little girl alone without any supervision. I have the feeling, and I hope I'm wrong, that they will never see her again. I don't think she is dead though. I personally think, and it's only my opinion, that this little girl has been sold. If this is the case and she is being well looked after she will soon forget who her real family are, children at that age would not remember too much.

2007-06-22 07:32:26 · answer #2 · answered by Dr Paul D 5 · 2 1

Jail them for neglect.

I am a mother and would NEVER leave my child 100 yards away in a room while I was out wining and dining.

The most i have ever left my child asleep, was to walk down the drive to put the bin out, and that was in a secure cot not three in a bed.

Unbelievable that they said kids were supposedly being checked on twice hourly, as if it was a good thing! How terrible they appear so cold about it.

Yes but now what of this poor little girl? Maybe she knew her kidnapper. Maybe the Limited company set up is to fund the kidnapper's silence. Wouldn't want them blackmailing the mccanns now.

2007-06-22 17:07:24 · answer #3 · answered by Chocolate Bunny 3 · 0 1

the little ones will possibly no longer have advised you the finished tale. the mummy and dad have been probable interior the lodge eating place and a 10 12 months previous ought to probable babysit for youthful siblings for 30 min. particularly if the mummy and dad have been nonetheless interior the lodge. in case you ought to make a factor of why mum and dad ought to under no circumstances bypass away a new child unattended then possibly clip out newspaper clipping approximately little ones getting harm mutually as the mummy and dad had left them unattended. do no longer say which you're displaying them the articles because of the fact of what they did interior the lodge. basically that they might think of two times earlier leaving the little ones on my own returned.

2016-10-18 09:21:55 · answer #4 · answered by erly 4 · 0 0

People are also forgetting no evidence has been shown that she was kidnapped by anyone as well. This little girl has just gone missing and the last person to see her was her dad according to them at his 9 pm check but then there is the hotel staff that said they never left the table. I would say thus far there is no evidence to support anything. All we have is our theories.

2007-06-22 12:04:49 · answer #5 · answered by Ladybugs77 6 · 1 0

Because in the 'pc' world you cannot blame the parents. It's NEVER their fault. Dont you know that if you blame the parents you may hurt their feelings?

A 'unattended' child hangs himself with the cord from the window shades. Parent's fault? No way - blame the window shade manufacturer.

A 'unattended' child tresspasses into a neighbors yard and drowns in the pool. Parent's fault? No way - sue the neighbor.

It's NEVER the parent's fault, and when they do blame a parent it's always the man - NEVER THE WOMAN'S FAULT! NEVER.

The chick who killed her 5 kids. It's not her fault. She had demons. The young college girl who recently killed her 'new born'. It's not her fault. The OTHER time, she dumped her kid in a dumpster.

2007-06-22 07:37:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I think you will find that that point is lost on no-one, least of all the McCanns.

A better question, to my mind, would be when will people realise that asking the same idiotic questions and making the same nasty innuendos over and over and over again is a big fat waste of everyone's time and achieves NOTHING?

2007-06-22 10:25:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

on the contrary, tbsheart, they are NOT taking any blame or any responsibility for their actions. They have denied any wrongdoing in leaving Madeleine alone.

2007-06-22 09:50:34 · answer #8 · answered by amcfan84 6 · 1 0

and just how do you think letting balloons off and selling stuff on e bay will help exactly?

2007-06-22 10:29:38 · answer #9 · answered by Karl 7 · 1 0

I totaly agree with you;what were they thinking?

2007-06-22 15:52:10 · answer #10 · answered by Mary H 3 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers