John Edwards, good for the economy?
2007-06-22 07:08:25 · 12 answers · asked by Peace Maker 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Funniest part about this question.....Not one Lib or Con gave an answer, they both just went to the talking points about the cut.....LOL
I could care less what anybody pays for a haircut.
I just wanted to know if that type of spending is part of supply-side economics' trickle down theory.
2007-06-22 07:17:52 · update #1
except Kawaii
2007-06-22 08:08:50 · update #2
Yes. He is supporting people by paying them for services with his personal money.
If you think that sum is outrageous, then you believe in his concept of two Americas.
2007-06-22 07:10:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
information flash, ppl fled manhattan and are fleeing CA with the aid of intense taxes. mutually as trickle down economics will possibly no longer restoration the priority as you spot it, its surely lots extra advantageous than the tax the wealthy plan that motives them to flee the intense tax section. devoid of "wealthy" ppl there is not any investment capital, and you're achieved. If wealthy ppl pass their money in another usa, you wouldnt get a cent of their money which pay a extensive element of our tax sales and then this usa is complete. yet you desire to maintain on pushing, extra and extra until you smash the best factor you have going now.
2016-10-18 09:19:43 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well I don't know about economy, but its definitly bad for politics. just goes to show that there is no chance to get elected if you dont look sharp. Pandering to the same morons who care about what kind of money a rich guy spends on his haircut, i imagine. At least he didnt by a segway. Thats hurting the economy.
2007-06-22 07:12:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Edwards is a lying, thieving, crook just like the rest of the bunch. I am still waiting to feel the trickle down. What has trickled onto me isn't very pleasant so far.
2007-06-22 07:14:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
I'll wager Fred Thompson, as an actor, every day, gets haircuts and makeup that would dwarf the 400 dollars edwards shelled out.
2007-06-22 07:12:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
You're using John Edwards as a model for this! He's two faced. Speaks for the people out of one side of his mouth and then promotes taxation from the other.....Oh...wait a minute! I forgot he's a Democrat!
2007-06-22 07:13:21 · answer #6 · answered by jimmyd 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Honestly, I am a conservative but I think that whole hair-cut thing was blown out of proportion. How are us conservatives going to convince anyone to vote for us when we spend our time yelling at people for a haircut. It's childish.
2007-06-22 07:11:41 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Its part of his two Americas. You pay more taxes so lawyers like him can have $400 dollar haircuts.
2007-06-22 07:11:51 · answer #8 · answered by ALASPADA 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
No. It is part of its his money to with as he pleases.
If a millionaire lit a $100,000 pile of his or her money ablaze, its their right?
2007-06-22 07:13:30 · answer #9 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It's his money; therefore, he is allowed to spend it however he pleases.
Why are you upset about someone else's salon visits?
2007-06-22 07:13:27 · answer #10 · answered by Mathsorcerer 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋