it really depends, either way i would say at least 2or 3 on either, except latino becuz they usually have 5 other of their homies with them any way.
2007-06-22 07:05:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Depends if it is Jackie Chan, Jet Li, or Bruce Lee that would suffice. Those asian martial artists are lightning quick.
2007-06-22 14:16:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by Drake 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think one competent Asian martial artist could simultaneously kick the butts of pretty much any combination of white, black, or Latino guys.
2007-06-22 14:07:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
3 white men needed to put up a good fight with an asian, 2 black men needed and 5 latino needed to fight against asian.
2007-06-22 14:34:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by killy gonso 3
·
1⤊
3⤋
One if you're Bruce Lee. Lightning fast.
2007-06-22 14:05:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by xabe13 1
·
3⤊
0⤋
Well if they have some sort of weapon like a gun only one. If it's just a fist fight or something....probably a lot. Not trying to be mean or anything.
2007-06-22 20:35:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bruce lee would of been able to take on 50 drug dealers, 100 gardners and 200 trailer trash, all at the same time.
2007-06-22 14:08:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
one on one. never underestimate your opponent. I would rather fight a big man than a small one any time. remember it isn't the size of the dog in the fight but the size of the fight in the dog.
2007-06-22 14:52:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by Marvin R 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
one on one is a fair fight, may the best man win..... and i've got a bet going pal, so move out of my way and let the fight begin.
P.S. 55% correct answers = jacking off with one's self .... HOT
2007-06-22 14:39:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by jay 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
one for a white guy, two for a latino and three for a black guy.
thats a fact
2007-06-22 14:23:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋