English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-06-22 06:08:23 · 6 answers · asked by maddy 1 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

6 answers

Fault requires two criteria. First, an outcome or event must be 'judged' to be negative. Second, blame or fault must be assigned to the person believed to have caused the event or outcome.

For example, we wouldn't say "it's your fault that I'm happy." Happy is not undesirable, so we wouldn't consider it a negative nor look for someone to blame.

Fault, as in faulty, can also refer to a judgment that something or someone isn't "right". People are very often quick to tell us what our faults are from their perspective. I usually say "thanks for criticizing me. I'll think about it."

2007-06-22 06:13:28 · answer #1 · answered by guru 7 · 0 0

We observe, measure and estimate all things comparatively, referentially or relatively; there is nothing that could ever be beheld by our physical eye absolutely.

When see faults in things, we must have some standard of perfection in the mind according to which we can understand clearly how something is faulty. But if our fault finding is without any inherent grasp of any standard for perfection, ours views could be very subjective, and not objective. A set tea cups, for instance, could be made to a satisfactory degree of perfection, and then that set acts as a standard against which each individual cup can be viewed.

How good, for instance, is the Sun? Not good enough, its black spots are its flaws, and its erratic solar fairs are the fault that telecommunication systems on earth do not like a bit; we would like the Sun be a steady as anything imaginable in its function, that is to keep churning out heat and light for us endlessly without a glitch or a hitch.

The fact is that what is perfect is innate in the mind. As inside human mind, exist in immaculate perfection all things that we see in an outside world imperfect and faulty. We have a being so perfect, flawless and without a possibility of a fault in the mind; perfection so close that we never see it.

This is good, isn’t? That we have all the beauty, goodness, and truth perfectly secured in the secrets vaults of our mind. May be it is, but what I know that we constantly search things better and better in this world and end up finding faults with everything the comes our way. This search is killing us, I am telling you this. And we need to compromise in order to save what we have. There is nothing prefect in the world, but all things in the mind. Could our inner sense of perfection be the actual human fault?

2007-06-22 06:44:10 · answer #2 · answered by Shahid 7 · 0 0

fault, flaw, imperfections.....all things that make us human, that make us alive. Faults are in the eye of the beholder just like beauty.

2007-06-22 06:15:30 · answer #3 · answered by lilycat1173fwin 2 · 0 0

Um...

I think it means that in all of our imperfections and faults, we are perfect because perfection is imperfection.

Your question made absolutely no sense. You should have used QUOTATIONSSSS

2007-06-22 06:11:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think in our society.it is more of a question of who is guilty? And of what! Everything is always the fault of someone else! Therfore it is someone's fault, i.e. someone is guilty!

2007-06-26 01:21:42 · answer #5 · answered by jaded 4 · 0 0

just ask Andrea

2007-06-22 06:11:20 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers