Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire?

Question

In the movie Dumbledore, "HARRY! DID YOU PUT YOUR NAME IN THE GOBLET OF FIRE, DID YOU?! DID YOU?!"
In the book, "Did you put your name in the Goblet of Fire, Harry?" he asked CALMLY.

I see a slight difference, do you?

Answer 1

Yeah, I watched the movie and a year later I read the book, and I was like WHOA!

Answer 2

The imposter Mad Eye Moody (Barty Crouch Junior) confunded the Goblet of hearth utilizing a Confundus charm. He made the Goblet think of that there have been 4 college fairly of three. He entered Harry into the pretend fourth college so as that the Goblet purely had Harry as a call from that college. for this reason, he knew Harry could be drawn, because of the fact Harry grow to be the only entrant from this fake college. i'm hoping this is sensible. it fairly is extremely perplexing. and he or she is stable approximately what financial disaster it fairly is in!

Answer 3

Of course. In the movie Dumbledore is almost yelling at Harry. In the book Dumbledore is just asking Harry a simple question.

Answer 4

I wish that was the biggest of the differences between the book and the film...they left out the most important parts, like the relationship between Snape and Harry's father...plus I liked Richard Harris more than this new Dumbledore....

Answer 5

LOL :) looks like someone has a sense of humor. Yes I think i see the difference but movies tend to sell better when the action is more dramatic than melancholy. or it might be that the actor got a little caught up in the moment and just couldnt resist the temptation of being Mr.Dramatic. I'm shooting for my second answer. It sounds so much more humorous than the first one.

Answer 6

Yea, I noticed that. In an interview with JK Rowling, she said that she had agreed with the movie version of that scene because it would show that Dumbledore is losing his nerve and control over things. She used this as foreshadowing for the other movies and books.

To me it was just kind of strange.

Answer 7

Yes, but the movies are different from the books. We've known it from the start. That is the way it has always been. It is why just watching the moves is not enough.

Answer 8

Honestly, I don't like the new Dumbledore so much. He's to...firm. He doesn't have that twinkle in his eye like Alan Rickman did...i wish he hadn't died. He was brilliant. There's nothing we can do about it. But you know, Michael Gambon can be kind sometime, like when he's talking about dreams and the galaxies are flying above his head (in the movie).

Hm...

Answer 9

yea there is always a difference between books and movies the reason for this is that in movies there has to be more drama where in a book drama creates itself through the thoughts that you read

Answer 10

yeah the movie sucked compared to the book