2007-06-22 05:22:25 · 5 answers · asked by David K 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Let me rephrase the question.
Should all nations/governments be liquidated?
That mean the absence of politicians and leaders not laws or a police force.
2007-06-22 05:28:52 · update #1
Also no militaries.
If a person commits a crime the people collectively according to the golden rule will judge accordingly.
2007-06-22 05:30:20 · update #2
What we need is smaller government with a good plan to eliminate them all in the future.
Still we can have our nations. The only difference is that we'll have to handle ourselves and be responsible for it.
Historically, there's no evidence of wars without a government starting them.
I'd like to see evidence of a government doing something useful today.
2007-06-22 05:35:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
wouldnt that make it a anarchist state, i think in many respects your idea would work but in many others fail, i dont think this world would work under one leader isnt that a dictatorship, i think that if we had no organised government, every person should technically be leader, i dont believ in heirachy, its terrible and historically caused more wars than absence of heirachy
2007-06-22 12:39:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah sure, great idea, who's gonna run the new 1 world government?
2007-06-22 12:25:52 · answer #3 · answered by booman17 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wouldn't work, there'd be more fighting then ever before. Even within some countries people are fighting each other so how would this be any better?
2007-06-22 12:28:32 · answer #4 · answered by rz1971 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No just some like Mexico, France...........
2007-06-22 12:41:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋