I would never say that one person is a true representation of a particular state. all states are very diverse.
♂
2007-06-26 04:21:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by Tegarst 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Absolutely not. All true Texans know the biggest cities have their own personality (Dallas, Austin, Houston) but even then, the underlying commonality is nothing as abrasive as he is. Texans do not go around sounding that degenerate or kurt. He might have been "raised" in Texas, but he has the New England abrasiveness his mother and father come from.
2007-06-22 11:39:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
To some extent, yes. This great Lone Star state is populated mostly by uncultured, ego-centric pinheads. I think that may be the symbolic meaning of the single star on our state flag: a single point in the sky (minds) of the people that cannot be broadened easily to incorporate a wider or alternative view.
2007-06-22 11:34:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm not really sure what a good "representation" of the state of Texas would be... given that Texas is so large and versatile, complete with regional dialects.
I do believe, though, that G.W. is a fine representation of a U.S. citizen.
2007-06-22 11:31:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by scruffycat 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
No. He's not a good representation, and neither is Jessica Simpson. All Texans are not morons.
2007-06-26 00:49:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by amaya7 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Georgie is a true representation of the state of confusion.
2007-06-22 11:32:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
hell no, even if he was truly a texan, but he wasn't even born within the borders of the great state. therefore, by default he's out of the picture.
2007-06-22 11:30:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋