English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

10 answers

These are comman with spin bowling too.
To answer your question - the first 2 - wides and no balls - must be because the pacies put in more effort into every delivery.
Caught behind goes with swing or seam and bowled out due to completely missing the ball or chopping on the ball. Goes with pace and the wicket/weather.

2007-06-29 14:07:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You are wrong. A good spinner who spins the ball takes wickets much more than pace bowlers. Spinners can be a huge turmoil. A genuine spinner rocks & ransacks the mind of the batsmen for years unlike pace bowlers.
A spin bowler can spin much more than a pace bowler. A spin bowler is a calamity to the entire batting team. You should know that it takes the man's life for turning the ball. It is very difficult exercise to turn the ball. Lots of efforts and energy is required to turn the ball. Bones will pain for any genuine turn of the ball. A spin bowler who makes lots of turn of the ball during the day time has painful hand bones nights. The spin bowler has flight, directions, pace, turn, spin, variations etc. NEVER COMPARE pace bowlers have very little to offer compared to spin bowlers.

Most important thing is that the spin bowler needs the support of the fielders to take wickets. These days you don't find spin bowlers due to the reason that the one day cricket has killed the copy book batting, copy book bowling, and the copy book fielding. No time for genuine cricket game.

2007-06-28 00:23:32 · answer #2 · answered by Indian wizard 2 · 0 0

Spin bowling is more a controlled art than pace bowling. the sun up of spinners is much smaller than the pace bowlers and hence the chances of no balls.
It is more difficult to play a fast bowler than a spinner because of the speed with which the ball reaches the batsman is smaller.
In other words the batsman gets little time to react to a pace bowler

2007-06-22 20:14:19 · answer #3 · answered by Rej 2 · 0 0

Because of the pace.
The spinner bowls at an average speed of 80kmp and pace bowlers average 140 plus.[control is less in speed]

2007-06-26 00:18:08 · answer #4 · answered by SRK'S KNIGHT RIDERS 4 · 0 0

Because fast bowlers take big effort to deliver the bowl. They can be little bit wayward some times becase of that big effort. Spinners bowl slowely and they could easily put ball in the right area. Therefore you see very rarely spiners bowl a NO BALL.

2007-06-28 22:25:12 · answer #5 · answered by Thamara 3 · 0 0

Wides and No Balls are invariably bowled by spinners too. The chances of getting edge of the bat are more when the batsman is facing Fast Bowlers.

2007-06-22 04:31:45 · answer #6 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0 0

in pace bowling the ball and the bowler both tend to move out of control more often than spinners. this is due to their run-up speed which is much greater than that of the spinner. hence the no of wides and no-balls is more in the case of pace boewlers.

2007-06-22 18:43:35 · answer #7 · answered by L N 1 · 0 0

fast bowlers bowl more noballs because they are running in from a distance and more pressure is given at delivery strides...Wides is more of a control problem..fast bowlers get more wickets behind the wicket bcoz of more pace in the ball and spinners get wickets infront of the wicket bcoz of lack of pace........

2007-06-22 04:50:46 · answer #8 · answered by Rajesh 2 · 0 0

%. wickets frequently have somethin in it for the bowler at specific durations(eg. substitute of ball, 1st hour or so of the journey, jus after a smash whilst the pitch develop into rolled). After this time, whilst the batsman has settled that's achieveable to play his photos n positioned the undesirable balls away.. as a result nighttime up the competition because of the fact the pitch will stil produce the best balls.. Spinning tracks frequently favour the team batting 1st as that's the only time the place a brilliant score is achieveable.. different than that scoring would be extremely sluggish frequently ensuing in a one sided affair

2016-10-18 08:52:08 · answer #9 · answered by lindenberg 4 · 0 0

Rajesh is rite

2007-06-22 20:51:41 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers