thnak god i have 3 boys becouse if that was me i would be in jail right now. i woulda killed the mf
2007-06-22 03:09:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by Andrew E 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
ii Answered Yur Other Question But Thinkin Bewt It Babee Im 16 And ii WUldnt Wannaa B Settling Dwn With A 54 Year Old Man Think About It Babee If Yu Get Married And Stuff Like That And Yu Find Someone Else You Will Feel Gutted And No Offence Hunnii Yu Wuld B Better Off With Someone Your Own Age So Yu Can Go Out And Have Fun And It Technically Does Mean She Is Perving On Yu Because Yur Not Even 18 if you was 18 it wuld b diffrent don chuck your life away babee :D X
2016-05-17 09:11:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Normally, not knowing the situation, I would say NO WAY, but I know of one such case where I would counsel them both to wait until she is at least 19, preferably 21, depending on emotional maturity. If they still feel the same way and have been truly committed to each other's well-being for all that time, then yes, I could bless their union. As for the high school track coach, he should have focussed his amorous attentions on adult women or find another line of work - totally inappropriate behavior for him to let things get that far.
2007-06-22 04:07:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No way! She is a child and her parents shouldn't have given in to her. If they truly 'didn't want to lose her' they should have put their foot down instead of letting her make what will probably be the biggest mistake of her life.
Furthermore, I can't understand why a 16 year-old would WANT to be married let alone marry a 40 year-old! This is just absurd.
2007-06-22 01:49:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Not even for a minute would I consider that for my daughter. Her track coach would be in tons of trouble being involved with a under age child where I live. I would make sure he gets what he deserves.
2007-06-22 01:57:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by Bazinga 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Obviously not.
I mean compared to a 16 year old young woman to a 40 year old man...sounds creepy. They are 24 years apart. They could be old enough for the 40 year old to be the 16 year old's father.
2007-06-22 01:54:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by ... 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO!!!!! He is a PREDATOR -- straight PREDATOR -- and they should have PRESSED CHARGES for Statuatory Rape, Interference in Parental Custody, Contributing to the Delinquency of a Minor ... etc etc etc -- CALL The police every time this pervert came around the girl .. and INSISTED on charges being PRESSED and FILED and put his NASTY PREDATORY rear in jail where he belongs!
WOW ... NO!!! This is just NASTY -- and Predatory. HOPE he is NOT teaching or coaching or ever able to go back into the Schools to PREY on any child any more.
2007-06-22 01:52:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by sglmom 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I agree. Age differences are not a problem, as long as both people are at least legal age. The 40 year old should know better....
2007-06-22 09:26:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by son_of_glen 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No I don't agree with it..
The only way I could contemplate allowing it would be if he was extremely wealthy, close to death, and was a monk or priest that made a vow of chastity.. But even then I would have a very hard time with it..
2007-06-22 02:44:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by LokoLobo 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes they should have done something differnce,16yrs boy or girl has to much to give and learn about life to be married and in the long run {and I hope this does not happen} they will break up and she/or he will be mad at thier parents.
2007-06-22 03:42:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hellno I wouldn't. That story comes from my state...North Carolina. Yay - something else to be embarrassed about. From what I understand, the parents reluctantly signed an agreement allowing her to marry. Why did they do that??
2007-06-22 01:48:12
·
answer #11
·
answered by casey_leftwich 5
·
3⤊
0⤋