English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

"The phone rang in the District of Columbia's busy 911 emergency hot line center as it does hundreds, sometimes thousands, of times a day. A burglary was in progress at a private home. The police department employee who handled this particular call assured the caller assistance wa on its way. But instead of getting the high-priority code a crime in progress is supposed to get, the dispatcher assigned a lower priority to the call. When police officers finally arrived at the scene of the burglary, they failed to make a thorough check of the building and left without discovering the two burglars, who by this time had raped a four-year-old girl adn forced her mother to commit sodomy. The victims' neighbors, two women who lived upstairs, made a second 911 call again receiving assurance that help was on the way. No help ever arrived. For the next fourteen hours, the intruders held all the occupants of the building captive, including the two women who lived upstairs,They were all rapeThey were all raped, robbed, beaten, and subjected to numerous sexual attacks.
So, you think the government will protect you, without you having guns. THEY WON’T. You’re not taking my guns till you pry them from my cold, dead, fingers.

2007-06-22 01:14:36 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

5 answers

Gun control is evil. Allowing law abiding citizens to own guns is a beautiful thing, it allows the good to defend themselves against the evil. Hard working productive happy people do not deserve to be shot up and robbed defenseless by someone who bought a gun on the black market.

Places with gun control have higher gun crime rates because criminals feel safer, look it up.

A vote for gun control is a vote for criminals.

2007-06-22 01:23:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i might think of the respond is not any. There are people who want stricter gun controls. And there are people who've a private concern that a gun might sometime be used against them. at the same time as there is in all probability a great deal of overlap between those 2 communities, i will think of people who purely fall into one classification or the different. There may well be people who want stricter gun controls, no longer out of private concern of being shot, yet out of a greater robust social purpose. additionally, there may well be people who concern getting shot, yet oppose gun administration for the reason that it would make it harder for them to acquire a gun with which to preserve themselves against the scary criminal. it would be exciting to take a appropriate polland see how the numbers come out.

2016-12-13 10:01:30 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Gun control is like global warming & the anti smoking agenda, a ruse for the real agenda, which is people control/social engineering! Vote for Ron Paul & support OUR Libertarian party to take back YOUR country/freedom!

2007-06-22 01:28:18 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I totally agree with you and i carry one in my car . If you try to car jack me I can promise someone that will be the last car they jack . Having a 125 lb rottie in my car helps too . Cause while the dog has got you I am going to shoot them . I totally agree with you .

2007-06-22 01:19:43 · answer #4 · answered by Kate T. 7 · 0 0

I am with you.

2007-06-22 01:19:16 · answer #5 · answered by Reported for insulting my belief 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers