2007-06-20 17:58:48 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Iraqi freedom isn't a lie, it's a fact. Iraqis were being tortured under the terrorist Saddam, now they are FREE. I know you take freedom for granted but many in this world do not.
GOD Bless America.
2007-06-20 18:01:02 · answer #1 · answered by x 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋
9/11 victims are being insulted and trivialized by insane and unfounded conspiracy theories. This is a verifiable and valid fact - supported by engineers, scientists, physicists and other experts from around the world..
If troops are being killed in Iraq because of government lies - where is the proof? What were the lies? Were both houses of congress in on this lie?
Opinions and conclusions don't necessarily reflect the truth.
2007-06-20 18:17:37 · answer #2 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Insulted? NOP:
Is the best tribute to them, questioning the goverment to really find what was behind their deads and if the actions after that, were the real "rigth thing" to do.
In fact, What's the real connection between Iraq and 9/11? Do anyone here remember a country called Saudi Arabia and a man called Osama Bin Laden?
2007-06-20 18:02:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
RIGHT ON! I cannot believe some of the people here who would still support a government that is blatantly lying to them. Like the staged "Press conference" with the troops who were screened and then rehearsed for a "live" event. With of course one saying how greatful and how much he loves Dubya! Or the staged landing on the carrier deck that was actually close to home AND the shore!! Who would have the disgrace to wear a uniform when they never served and then play GIJoe! HOLY SMOKES!!
The only they have to shout out is Un-American and the "crazy" people with agendas to discredit the real people who suffered on 9-11 and their families. Not to mention refusing to meet with grieving parents or attending funerals of soldiers he sent to a pointless war. SHAME!
To the other blind mice and back slappers GO AHEAD AND GIVE ME A THUMBS DOWN it just shows my point even more...YOU LEMMINGS! mwahahahahhah....
2007-06-20 18:14:22 · answer #4 · answered by MissKittyInTheCity 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Even the political leadership of my party backed away from the "lie" claim. Why are you still holding on to it?
No, they are not being insulted by questions. They are being insulted (we all are) by seditious comments by people who don't know how to disagree/dissent/protest in a patriotic way.
You call the government liars. The burden of proof is on you unless you are treating them as "guilty until proved innocent". A more un-American attitude I don't know of. It is common for the seditious to claim someone lies without any proof of such a lie. It is also common for patriots to answer them accordingly.
You can't be seditious and patriotic at the same time. Questions are not unpatriotic. Calling our representatives names, etc. is.
It's also contemptible.
2007-06-20 18:11:49 · answer #5 · answered by mckenziecalhoun 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
that's actual that the information courses are celebrating immediately that we've ultimately had an identical style of squaddies die as civilians did on 911 and of direction they're crossing their palms hoping for many greater in the hot twelve months. they're continually very careful to whilst itemizing casualties to make it look that we are killing Iraqi civilians who're scuffling with us returned with the aid of asserting that x# of Iraqis have been killed immediately in the warfare and x# of human beings have been killed with the aid of a roadside bomb, suggesting that we are on opposite aspects. quite they might desire to be elementary and say that x# of Iraqis and x# of human beings have been killed immediately with the aid of insurgents. they extra desire to confuse human beings into balloting democrat with the aid of suggesting that this one million to1 ratio is wildly out of whack. observe that they on no account certainly say that we are scuffling with Iraqi civilians or that this ratio is undesirable they only mean it. yet doing so known for years has had its needed consequence. merely look at our final elections. if certainty learn that during alternative wars 3 hundred,000 to one million grew to become into on no account seen unacceptable. maintaining the harmless is what this warfare is all approximately. that's what squaddies do.
2016-12-13 08:56:28 · answer #6 · answered by maiale 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Since when is killing terrorists, insurgents, militants, and overthrowing a madman something wrong? Why is it a lie? Do you think the world is better off with Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden? If so, go move over there and join them.
People like you scare me.
2007-06-20 18:05:30 · answer #7 · answered by C J 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Troops are not dying in Iraq because of govt. lies...
We can have the war over here or over there...
Having the war is not optional...
We got a sample on 9/11...
Better to have it over there...
2007-06-20 18:03:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."
--Theodore Roosevelt, 1912
2007-06-20 18:05:02 · answer #9 · answered by c7a7f 2 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Lies have been confusing people. Believe only in unbiased media.
2007-06-20 18:02:05 · answer #10 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋