Do the neocons realize yet that Iraq didn't attack New York on 9/11?

Question

I really don't think they do, if you read some of their rants.

Mckenzie, with "democrats" like you, who needs neocons??

Answer 1

Apparently, many of them don’t realize that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. I ran for my life on that day and I am furious at Bush’s diversion of resources and attention to Iraq and away from the terrorists who actually attacked us. Most New Yorkers like myself voted for Kerry in 2004 because of this betrayal.

Answer 2

I really don't like labels and stereotypes. I don't think that anyone even thought or said that they had. What we were told was that they had weapons of mass destruction. Which we know now was a lie. But if he had them then he was a threat. That is why I can't fault anyone for believing the president. He swore to uphold the constitution and protect Americans. I voted with him twice but I will not vote for anyone even if they are Republican if they believe he is right. As a matter of fact I believe he should be impeached. It would not get past two thirds of the Senate but it would make a statement that needs to be made. To top things off today he vetoed a bill for stem cell research in spite it is the will of the people and can heal many diseases. He put his religious beliefs above the health and well being of the people.
We send troops to war knowing some will die. But we make a decision that not to do so would be worse. So how is that different in using embryos to save lives.

Answer 3

You heavily ought to stop generalizing. with the help of ways, i'm a conservative and concept this war develop right into a misstep interior the 1st place. Bush have been given poor intelligence and Saddamn develop into no longer keen to allow inspectors in. might that sound suspicious to you? The war isn't beautiful in any respect. besides, if I have been maximum appropriate the country, i might artwork to seal off the Mexican border. with the help of ways, virtually each and every terrorist that has been nabbed snuck for the time of it. isn't it humorous that the final public of the two events agree on putting this loss of life nail in united statesa.'s coffin? you ought to open your eyes and stop regurgitating the leftist rhetoric your commie professor (who's probable a dunce) spews at you. If that's no longer your concern and you concept this up on your very own, then you definately ought to work out approximately checking your self into your nearest psychological employer. There are good human beings there and that they are able that may assist you.

Answer 4

you actually have two types of neocons or conservatives that support the war. There are those that still actually think that Iraq had something to do with 9-11 and there are those that simply don't care if they were involved or not. They just support the war because of loyalty to Bush or loyalty to party.

Answer 5

Al Qaeda hated Saddam. Saddam hated Al Qaeda.

There were more Al Qaeda terrorists in the USA on 9/10 than were in Iraq. Were we harboring terrorists, too?

Bottom line- racists think Mexican, Chinese, Black, Arab, Indian are all dark skinned potential terrorists who can't be trusted.

If Iraqis were white, we wouldn't be there.

Answer 6

Those are a bit strange, but no more strange than the desperate attempts of others to pretend that that's the only reason we attacked Iraq and therefore it was wrong to do so.

1) Iraq attacked one of our allies (Kuwait). We defended them, had a cease-fire, Iraq broke it frequently while we waited ten years for the U.N. to do something about it. Saddam bragged he was fooling the U.N. and U.S. repeatedly to his allies even up to the month of the second invasion, claiming he HAD WMDs and was hiding them and giving them away. We gave up waiting and attacked.

2) Saddam repeatedly went on T.V. and other media offering payments to the families of suicide bombers that would attack Israel, another of our allies. They asked us to get involved. We supported our ally who was being attacked by Iraq.

3) Saddam attempted to assassinate the elder Former President Bush. If that isn't a reason to go to war, nothing is.

Need I go on?

I'm not a neo-con. I'm a democrat. My family escaped Islam in the 1950s. We've been expecting this war for decades. The excuses and evasions some of the U.S. citizens make in absence of any understanding of the Islamic culture stun me.

Folks, educate yourself about what you are fighting.

Answer 7

exposing liberals,

That is idiotic. if you were to have a murder trial and used the evidence that bush did regarding al-qaeda you would get laughed out of the court room. The eye witness lied, and the reports were fudged, bush even admitted the reports on nukes was dead wrong, though unconnected it is just as bad.

Answer 8

To Exposing Liberals, and Dead Marxist:
1. There was no evidence that Saddam harbored Al-Qaeda terrorists. Saddam had nothing to do with Bin Laden or 9/11.
2. Germany and Italy declared war on us on December 11th, 1941, four days after Pearl Harbor and three days after we declared war on Japan. We didn't declare war on Germany until after they declared war on us.

Iraq never declared war on us.

Answer 9

911 was an inside job.. i swear people who don't see this are the ones who don't actually look at the evidence and see this couldn't of happened the way they said it did. Buildings don't collapse that way, no wreckage of planes, people heard explosions, flight 93 was heard to blow up in the sky, not on the ground. Overall, there is no way people with little or no flight experience could of done this with the precision it happened.. But people just don't want to hear it

Answer 10

So its just the neo Conservatives you are referring to? Or all Conservatives? Or is it Moderate Republicans? Conservative Republicans? Or all Republicans. Focus your hate grasshopper.