I believe that you are misinterpreting the big-bang hypothesis. The universe has finite size. It is getting bigger. At present, most physicists don't believe there is a mechanism to halt the growth of the universe and cause it to contract. It is reasonable to ask what is "outside" the universe, but no-one knows since we can't even see to the end of the "inside" of the universe.
2007-06-20 17:41:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by cattbarf 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think I saw your theory or something similar somewhere. Anyway, I understand it like this:
The universe does end. Not at a border, but it's kind of complex. Look, imagine a tennis ball with an ant walking around it. The ant walks on the surface of the tennis ball, therefore moves in two dimensions: length (forward, backward) and width (left, right). We could, in a way, say that the ant is living in two dimensions. Now, suppose the surface of the tennis ball is a universe. A two-dimensional universe. The ant cannot get to the border of the surface universe, because it will just keep going round and round. If it goes in a straight line, it will come back to the place where it was.The borders would be clear if the ant could look up and down, where, it would be apparent, it would only have to go up to escape the universe and it would enter a three-dimensional universe: our own.
Now, imagine our universe as the three-dimensional surface of a four-dimensional universe. We cannot see this fourth spacial dimension because we are three-dimensional beings. But, if we go in a straight line, we won't come to a border, we will just go around the four-dimensional sphere and get back to the place where we were.
I'm still kind of confused myself as to how the big bang fits into all of this, but I think I'm starting to get it. See, what I think happened is that the big bang was the explosion of the four-dimensional sphere, so when it exploded, the three-dimensional surface we live in also started expanding.
That was the best way I could come up with of explaining it. If you're confused, there's nothing I can do about it.
2007-06-22 05:32:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
--Albert Einstein
So if Einstein is not sure.. I don't think Yahoo answers will do much better... but...
The mass of the entire universe may bend the "edge" of space/time back upon itself enough that a voyage to the edge of the universe may have you turning around back to the interior without you "turning" on your own.
Also... If you define the universe as the space in which everything exists, then anywhere you go is within the universe.
Maybe LindaJune knows... time will tell...
2007-06-20 18:14:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by erikfaraway 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your problem is which you have the "bags" of what you have faith "The universe would desire to have an end" Why? "if the universe ends, what's outdoors the universe? " why would desire to there be an "outdoors" There ought to be some thing outdoors the universe" Why "... meaning that it includes on continuously." definite? , and thats a poblem as a results of fact??? "How can there never be a shrink to a minimum of a few thing?" now you're decrease back on your first problem Now to make issues much greater complicated purely image you're a 2 dimensional creature residing in a 2 dimensional worldwide (like your universe is a ball). Your 2d universe includes forward/backward and left/perfect. you may have not any theory that a third length (up/down) would desire to exists no theory on what a three-d universe could look like, and no theory as to the thank you to get to the third length. you would be able to desire to bypass so a methods as you like in any direction yet you may never come to an end. which you're you able to your universe is countless, and it dont have an "outdoors" (cos there is not any "outdoors" of your 2d universe) yet quite the completed universe is 3-d, So in this 3-d universe your 2d universe (a ball) is finite,(its purely a ball) So your countless 2d universe is finite if it exists in a three-d UNIVERSE (universe is the only you exist in and would conceive , UNIVERSE is the "genuine" universe that your universe exists in) Now purely think of the comparable for a three-d universe (like the only we are residing in) present in a 4D universe Is our 3-d universe countless or finite? and much greater mindbogling, think of your 3 dimensions are purely portion of say a 5 dimensional "entire" UNIVERSE? which you would be able to bypass "outdoors" your 3 dimensions is purely to bypass into one (or greater) of the different dimensions.you're no longer outdoors the UNIVERSE purely outdoors your 3 dimensions of it. (at present your 3 dimensions are length x height x width (=l x h x w) purely think of in case you have been in a 4D UNIVERSE and would desire to change a million of those dimensions for the 4th length ( say z) so which you would be able to now be l x h x z you would be able to desire to nonetheless exist as a three-d creature yet with 2 dimensions in OUR universe (like a sheet of paper), yet your third length interior the 4th length which we could no longer see)
2016-09-28 05:18:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The universe does have an end, the trick is that it is constantly changing. Beyond this expansion is empty space, or dark void.
2007-06-23 13:35:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The universe's 'size' is only defined by the things in it, so although we say it is expanding, this really means that the distance across it is getting bigger.
2007-06-20 17:50:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by Ali 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your this question is very interesting, just like the ones on inherent twin theory. I always wonder where the first twins come from...??
2007-06-20 17:39:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by Den 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your speculation is as good as any and like others isn't supported by any facts at all. No one knows.
2007-06-20 17:57:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by Michael da Man 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Supposedly nothing
2007-06-20 17:39:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The void.
2007-06-23 05:23:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by johnandeileen2000 7
·
0⤊
0⤋