it's kind of a complicated game there's how you play
it involves two people you use your hand to make an object
fist is rock
open hand is paper
first and middle finger out is scissors
what you do is count to three then both of you make one of those three gestures
and to find the winner use this chart
paper beats rock
rock beats scissors
scissors beats paper
hope that helps
nirav
he who laughs last thinks the slowest
2007-06-20 16:59:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by blackcivic 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Scissor Paper Stone Game
2016-12-16 20:36:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I understand that Scissors can beat Paper, and I get how Rock can beat Scissors, but there's no effing way Paper can beat Rock. Paper is supposed to magically wrap around Rock leaving it immobile? Why the hell can't paper do this to scissors? Screw scissors, why can't paper do this to people? Why isn't notebook paper constantly suffocating students while they take notes in class? I'll tell you why: because paper can't beat anybody; a rock would tear that sh it up in 2 seconds. When I play rock/paper/scissors, I always choose rock. Then when somebody claims to beat me with their paper I can punch them in the face with my already clenched fist and say, "Oh sh it, I'm sorry. I thought paper would protect you!"
2007-06-20 17:03:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by kim 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
Remember that there was the original concept of a "penalty" -- that rock "crushed" scissors by having the scissors person hold out two fingers that the rock's fist could "crush" by striking; similarly, the scissors "cut" paper by having the two fingers snap down onto a hand held out flat; and the paper "covered" rock by having the paper person's hand rub forcefully over the rock's fist.
2007-06-20 17:17:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
The concept is simple... whatever you end up choosing, it can either beat your opponent, tie them, or they can beat you...
It goes like this:
Rock beats Scissors (it breaks the scissors)
Scissors beats Paper (it cuts the paper)
Paper beats Rock (it covers the rock)
If you both choose the same thing - then it is a tie... And you go again ;);)
2007-06-20 16:57:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by kr_toronto 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
YES!! im so glad someone is with me. u rock man. the concept does not make any sense at all...
heres the layout. rock breaks the blades of the scissors; therefore the scissors are rendered useless; u cant cut with it anymore.
scissors cuts paper; paper is useless b/c u cant write on a shreaded piece of paper
now...if a paper covers rock, the rock is still a rock, its not useless cuz u can still beat the scissors...IT DOESNT MAKE ANY SENSE!!! WHY CANT PAPER BE A FRIGGEN DYNAMITE WITH A CUTTABLE WICK!!!! OMG!!!!
2007-06-20 17:04:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jonnny 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
well this is my theory:
scissors cut paper, paper wraps around rock, rock beats up scissors AKA just breaks it
2007-06-20 16:57:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anthony T 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Shefali, too bad you stole that riff from youtube.
2007-06-20 17:08:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by Kacky 7
·
1⤊
0⤋