An eye for an eye... right? It's what Muhammad preaches.
"If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also." - Jesus
It's pretty obvious by this point who Dubya follows, huh? Who'd of thought!
650,000 IRAQI CIVILIANS TO OUR 3000 CIVILIANS ATTACKED ON 9/11 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A "JUST WAR"... Hypocrites!
"Just war is a specific concept of how warfare might be justified, typically in accordance with a particular situation, or scenario, and expanded or supported by reference to doctrine, tradition, or historical commentary. The tradition began in the ancient Greek society, and was later developed by a number of Christian theologians."
WHEN IT'S A "JUST WAR", ALL OF THESE CRITERIA MUST BE MET:
* Just cause: The reason for going to war needs to be just and can therefore be recapturing things taken or punishing people who have done wrong
* Comparative justice: While there may be rights and wrongs on all sides of a conflict, to override the presumption against the use of force, the injustice suffered by one party must significantly outweigh that suffered by the other;
* Legitimate authority: Only duly constituted public authorities may use deadly force or wage war;
* Right intention: Force may be used only in a truly just cause and solely for that purpose—correcting a suffered wrong is considered a right intention, while material gain or maintaining economies is not.
* Probability of success: Arms may not be used in a futile cause or in a case where disproportionate measures are required to achieve success;
* Last resort: Force may be used only after all peaceful and viable alternatives have been seriously tried and exhausted.
2007-06-20 16:34:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by Sangria 4
·
6⤊
2⤋
Attacking this question is not something I want to attack this evening because I have been attacked by so many outside influences that attacking your question would do nothing but lessen my thinking of the value of attacking.
2007-06-20 23:38:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by david o 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
Indiscriminately blowing up innocent men, women and children, cutting an innocent man's head off just to make another video, dragging, beating, hanging and burning bodies, gassing your own people, accumulating mass graves for your dissenters, threatening the world with conversion or death, etc...etc......etc..........
Some "people" simply need to be attacked - and the sooner, the better for the security and benefit of all civilized people.
2007-06-21 00:07:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by LeAnne 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Come up with a different solution. And I mean a solution, not a theory, not a suggestion, not talks that might not improve anything. A solution. Then we'll talk about your self-righteous question.
2007-06-20 23:38:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by tttplttttt 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
Because our nation is a nation of hypocrites and self righteous slobs. (Generally speaking). Most don't know why we do what our government does...we are therefore a nation of sheep for the wealthy to lead around at their pleasure! Duh! Why do you think we still have the electoral college?
2007-06-24 21:33:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by little timmie 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
If they break in your house and you attack them, it's not wrong.
2007-06-20 23:32:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
Who attacked whom ?
2007-06-20 23:32:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by missmayzie 7
·
5⤊
0⤋
School yard politics, you stand up to a bully and kick their but. Otherwise they will kick yours and pick on others smaller then themselves and do so until they are stopped.
2007-06-20 23:39:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by Joyce D 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
People who attack people will continue to attack people unless they are attacked.
2007-06-20 23:31:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by Brian 7
·
2⤊
4⤋
its for survival and protection of your homeland and families. we are not trying to prove to them that it is wrong because they obviously do not care.
2007-06-21 00:08:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋