Did you know that Hilary Clinton voted against the ban on partial-birth abortions ?
I was just reading about the Bill that congress passed to ban partial birth abortions in 2003. I can't believe that anyone would think that this procedure is a good idea, or could actually advocate this procedure.
In this procedure, the baby is killed while it is in the birth canal while it is being born.
According to congressional testimony that I read, this procedure is never needed to protect the health of the mother.
If you are in favor of partial birth abortions, tell me when an abortion is not acceptable to you. How about if the baby's toe is the only thing still inside the birth canal, is it ok to kill the baby then? How about 10 minutes before that, or the day before that, or a month before that ?
Will some abortion advocate please tell me when it is not OK to have an abortion? I haven't heard the answer to that yet.
2007-06-20
15:36:05
·
10 answers
·
asked by
h m
2
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
People on the left who are unabashed abortion supporters do not see any value in the life of the baby inside of the mother, they only see abortion as a political issue.
Luckily for those who believe this practice is infanticide, Congress passed the ban and the Supreme Court upheld it.
2007-06-20 15:48:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
1. Partial birth abortions are only performed in emergency situations - not as elective birth control.
2. You are working your panties in a bunch over a procedure that is performed in less than 2 % of the entire number of abortions performed.
3. The Religious Right uses this to get everyone all worked up because the straight forward abortion issue doesn't necessarily draw the distain that partial birth abortion does.
4. The Republicans did this vote to show the christian backers that they are doing something in the fight against abortion. They know that there is not a hope of Roe v. Wade getting reversed in this day and age - too many people feel it needs to be regulated, and making it illegal will not stop it. This is their attempt to pacify them and show they are doing something.
When is it not okay? When you decide you would like to be a parent. It is not any of my business what another person does or chooses to do with their life, as it is no one else's business what I do with mine. Too many people are worried about what everyone else is doing with their lives, and then when something happens in their lives, they claim to not be responsible. I think when someone has found a way to live a perfect life, then they should have the right to dictate what everyone else does with theirs. But until then, the decision falls onto the people that are directly affected by the entire thing - the man and the woman. It is none of my business.
2007-06-20 15:55:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Partial birth abortion is an EMERGENCY medical procedure. No one "elects" to have it done.
It really helps if you read the real testimony, and the AMA journals that go along with it. It is used as a last resort when the mother's life is threatened. The occurance is rare, less than 2% of all pregnancies. In thse situations, You either end up with one death (the fetus) or two deaths (the mother and the fetus).
~X~
2007-06-20 16:13:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by X 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
I have a soul & a heart & I am against Abortion for any reason It is very personnel to me. My daughter had a abortion at a Planned Parenthood Clinic & now because of something unforseen she can not have children, She was 19 & in collage & she was having a affair with her boss. she found out when she told him she was pregnant that he was married & had 4 children. He told her that he would pay for the abortion & if she did not go along with that , then he would make sure her mom & I knew about the affair.What he does not know is if he had told me about the affair, he would have needed a lot of hospital insurance. She deeply regrets the abortion. She has a man who has asked her to marry him three times but she refuses because she can not give him children. she has apoligized many times to her mother & I because she robbed us of a grand child. That is why I am against all forms of abortion. I just messes up so many lives.
2007-06-20 15:57:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by BUTCH 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Rowe vs. Wade proves the old adage that once you crack open the door, it becomes much easier to expand the opening and build on the premise.
I doubt very much that you will get a logical and well thought out answer from anyone who feels partial birth abortion is a woman's choice.
2007-06-20 16:01:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by LeAnne 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
The only time a late term abortion is done is when the woman's life is in extreme danger. Don't believe everything you hear.
The government needs to get out of women's wombs. It is HER body and hers alone; it doesn't belong to the state....
What goes on in the operating room between the patient and the doctor is nobody's business. And, unless the government is prepared to put a Homeland Security agent in the delivery room, nobody knows what is happening or why.
Back off the abortion issued.....Roe v Wade is here - it will stay here. And, the religious whackos are not going to be allowed to chip away at it. A delivery room is stil a private arena......
2007-06-20 16:49:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
LMAO @ pinche_bush above me ^^
He called partial birth abortion a "MEDICAL" decision. LMAO!!
Nobody thinks it is moral. Its just that so many people choose to do immoral things and even more people would like people to have the right to do immoral things.
2007-06-20 15:55:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i won't be able to speak for him yet i'm professional-selection because of the fact there are basically 2 aspects to this situation. you the two are for the female's rights or for the unborn's rights. If I help the unborn's rights then I certainly have do this one hundred% of the time or be a hypocrite. If I say no abortions yet make exceptions for rape or incest then i'm no longer being actual to the reason and leaving in the back of those that I declare to desire to guard. If I help the female's rights then it too must be one hundred% of the time devoid of exceptions. If i'm to be actual to my faith then i ought to persist with the classes of "decide no longer that ye be no longer judged". Even Jesus did no longer attempt to get rid of persons rights of loose will yet he did warn that they are going to ought to account for what they did in life. as quickly as I stand earlier Christ i do no longer desire to ought to describe why i attempted to thrust my ethical values on others or why i attempted to make others do my will mutually as invoking his call. a much extra advantageous answer may well be to push a medical definition of the beginning up of life. because of the fact the tip is defined with the help of the shortcoming of a different brainwave development then consistent with risk whilst a different development could properly be pointed out must be considered to be the beginning up. and not using a sparkling line being defined i visit proceed to assist a woman's freedom to opt for what happens to her very own physique. I see a lot of human beings bringing up Obama's vote against a bill that ought to have required medical therapy for survivors of an abortion. what they curiously do no longer understand (or opt for to no longer know) is this bill develop into redundant because of the fact there have been already regulations requiring such therapy. the recent bill develop into presented to no longer escalate any rights of supply further risk-free practices yet extremely to assist interior the schedule of overturning Roe vs Wade; it develop into to be yet another brick of their wall.
2016-10-18 05:12:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by xie 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
In order to under stand it's evils, you must first have a soul and a heart. some lack these essentials.
Libs are indiferant to Human life and spirituality, they only think inwards.
2007-06-20 15:39:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
your congressional testimony is incorrect.
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/356/21/2125
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/356/21/2128
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/356/21/2201
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/356/21/2195
2007-06-20 15:49:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by brian 4
·
1⤊
0⤋