....even though he was still on the juice? What about the opposite - if he wasn't on 'roids but was still his surly, selfish, mean self?
2007-06-20 13:59:07 · 14 answers · asked by hulidoshi 5 in Sports ➔ Baseball
If he wasn't on roids and an asshole I guess I feel that he would be applauded for what he did. Like look at A-Rod the dirty way he plays but people still will cheer him if he does something great. If he was nice and did roids I guess it would be split cause Giambi isn't viewed as a cheater at all even though we all know he was on the juice. Its because hes nice it gets pushed under the rug. Bonds is an asshole and on juice therfore everyone in America besides San Francisco hates him.
2007-06-20 14:03:12 · answer #1 · answered by monte_x2 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, i do no longer think of pupils have extremely replaced any, human nature being what that's, particularly, the could experience greater suitable than somebody else. Then there is the adolescent preoccupation with self and image. What may be needed are greater heroes, those uncommon huge-unfold pupils prepared to pass out their thank you to spend time with the unpopular ones, the "outcasts." wanting that, in simple terms going to college performances and video games to assist the members does far greater good than every person can think of. Band geeks are human beings, too. no longer tolerating abuse of any style is likewise some thing every person and all of us can do to assist. Like, in case you at the instant are not area of the answer, then you certainly're area of the priority, perchance the priority. for every person else, the asserting is as actual as ever, that no teen is ever as constructive as he or she looks. What you spot on the outdoors is probably no longer even on the brink of what's going on interior. And human beings are social creatures via nature. no person extremely needs to be on my own all the time. get entangled. Get fascinated.
2016-10-08 22:15:59 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not saying to give the dude a chance, but sometimes people do change and slowly but surly, (oops.... surely).
He's okay, personality wise because most athletes would rather stay private and not give people the time of day. It's his choice.....
2007-06-21 12:37:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Bonds was nice, he'd be in the position Giambi is currently in. League still wouldn't like him, but at least he'd have the backing of the majority of baseball fans...
2007-06-20 17:24:54 · answer #4 · answered by Tim J 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If the whole 'roids thing didn't surround him I'd compare him to Gary Sheffield. At one point he was a good guy, good player, but lately he has been an @$$.
2007-06-20 15:05:21 · answer #5 · answered by mplsundin 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Give me something to like. I have a hard time to really support players who are selfish and nasty. I also have a hard time to support players who use drugs to enhance their performances. Bonds is a great player-no doubt, but it isn't enough to make me like him.
2007-06-21 04:11:53 · answer #6 · answered by Nicegirl 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My opinion of Bonds would change if he be honest and upfront with the public about the allegations against him.
2007-06-20 14:13:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well I think hes a douche but I still want him to break the home run record. I just want to see all the "guilty until proven innocent" people get pissed off.
2007-06-20 14:03:09 · answer #8 · answered by Ballzy 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
yes i would still hate him because:
1. he is a cheater and thats messed up when there are people like pujols who are doing it on pure skill. its like putting flubber on your shoes to cheat in basketball(if you watched the movie flubber)
2. im a dodger fan
2007-06-20 14:08:49 · answer #9 · answered by tyler 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You must not live in Boston because at every Red Sox Yankee game u hear
A-Rod walks up........OVERRATED
Giambi walks up.......BALCO
Rivera comes to pitch........*Cheers*
LMAO seriously
2007-06-20 14:06:00 · answer #10 · answered by CCSpence8 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋