Thats why we are in iraq still.
2007-06-20 13:41:10 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The UN is not worthless.
They are a potential source of tremendous amusement, if only we could load the ambassadors onto large catapults and fling them into the oceans, or against walls.
2007-06-20 13:44:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
whoa, pal. The UN is a great idea for nations to come together and discuss the world issues. The US is the World Police and the War in Iraq is an important war for fighting against terrorism, setting up democracy, etc. Even though we have been there a bit too long, I still think we should finish out the job.
2007-06-20 20:44:37 · answer #2 · answered by John Doe 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Eto, we are there to protect the country of Israel and the huge profits from the oil industry.
What happened to the Billions of dollars of oil revenue? well ask the boys on the Hill..Washington DC..it is all smoke and mirrors..The United States will be in Iraq for a long time..no matter who is President or what party is in office..we are committed forever
2007-06-20 20:47:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The UN has been useless for years. I could not agree more. If it was actually working we would of never gone to Iraq in the first place!
2007-06-20 20:46:21 · answer #4 · answered by LeeAnne 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Bush itinerary
Argue with U.N.
Embarrass the nation by being a dumb ***
Insult other country leaders
Invade country under the guise of false information.
3:00 pm have afternoon tea with Bin Laden family
Ten year plan - cause world war 3
2007-06-20 20:50:56 · answer #5 · answered by plasmajosh 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The UN is not worthless. It's not worth what it costs, nor the debacles it's been responsible for, but it does some worthwhile things.
No, I can't think of any at the moment...
2007-06-20 20:45:04 · answer #6 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It could do something but the US is behind about 100 million in past dues since Bush took office.
2007-06-20 20:49:52 · answer #7 · answered by steinerrw 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are blaming Iraq on the UN? No. Bush lied to the UN, he said he would go back for approval before starting any attack, but he knew that they already knew there were no WMD's so he attacked anyway. Its not the UN's fault, its the stupid American public's fault for ever entrusting the Presidenty to bush.
2007-06-20 20:44:28 · answer #8 · answered by jxt299 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
about as worthless as any group that comes together in an attempt to settle their differences in a non-violent way.
OH wait....that called being civilized!
2007-06-20 20:46:55 · answer #9 · answered by avail_skillz 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
totally worthless. its full of corruption from the head on down....... that lying kofi!!!!!!!!! i wont even mention the other atrocities that were committed for it boils my blood. they should kick them out and let homeless people move in or something. or make a food court that sells trans fat foods.!
2007-06-20 21:00:43 · answer #10 · answered by Mustardseed 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋